Neil Armstrong was a great and honorable man. Nothing that trolling idiots or conspiracy-theory loonies can say will ever change that, or make them into the tiniest fraction of the man he was.

Nothing new about "you have to call." For my home internet I'm on Hawaiian telcom. When I signed up they gave me a "guaranteed rate for life." What they meant was that it was guaranteed not to drop when they lowered their prices.

I have to agree. The guy says it creates poetry that can't be distinguished from "real" poetry. Maybe so ... if you consider any old junk that any self-styled "poet" writes.

Try comparing with a true poet like Tennyson or Teasdale or even Charles Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll).

Warum nicht?

I am myself an MIT grad and I can testify to the fact that foreign language instruction at MIT was every bit as rigorous as CS instruction. That said, MIT did not have a specific admissions requirement for foreign language instruction in secondary school, although it was a distinguishing "plus" in a super-competitive admissions process.

If a university has a foreign language admissions requirement for a specific reason (as opposed to just something put in place by a non-knowledgeable regulator), then it's hard to see how CS can substitute for that. If the foreign language requirement doesn't have a particular reason, there's no purpose in it.

My own opinion, as someone who took the time to become conversant in numerous foreign languages, is that, particularly for Americans, foreign language study is an important means of learning about cultures beyond our shores ... something Americans need to do a lot better at.

This last comment is very insightful and addresses something I've thought about from time to time.

You pay whatever it is that Windows costs (no, it isn't free just because it's bundled on a computer), and then what do you have? Actually, not much. You have an operating system and a few tools (and maybe a bunch of bundled demo crapware).

You install Ubuntu or Mint or similar, and you have a suite of tools, and the means to easily install more, for free. Like Inkscape, as the lead article discusses. Within half an hour or less you can have full-featured computing that should meet at least 90% of the needs of 90% of users (maybe even better than that). I'm not going to get into the arguments about specialized tools or high-end features or cutting-edge gaming; if you truly need such things, go buy them and put them on your Windows system.

Linux has served me for many years. In the early years, things were rougher around the edges, but today, it's night and day difference. As I'm not much of a gamer, there is little or nothing that I need Windows for. I "get by" just fine with GIMP, and the new Inkscape is amazing, as is LibreOffice ... not to mention EMACS, of course :)

Sorry but I just don't see a personal need to spend money on software.

As I say every so often, I'm just so glad I don't have to deal with any of this. I need to actually get something done on my computer, and Linux has served me well for 20 years. To each his own.

The map leaves off Hawaii (and Alaska). Guess we don't count or don't exist.

I think the scrolls warned about global warming. Fortunately, Al Gore was able to recover their content for the benefit of all mankind.

No, it's global warming.

"All" they did? What they did was provide a choice, and a rather good one.

No more excessive than $200,000 per song downloaded or whatever it is.

I think it's all caused by global warming.

Reminds me of a real estate transaction once where the company handling it said, if you buy title insurance for $500, we'll waive our $500 processing fee.

Our condo building provides "basic" cable as part of the maintenance fee. I'd be all for dropping even that to save a little money. Over the air TV still exists, after all, even if the choices are limited. But given that I don't even watch what I have available now, I doubt that I'd care.