Some hydrocarbons are pretty nasty to humans. And yes they can occur in wells anyway. It pays to test.

They run at a different regime where 5ms (up from about 100microseconds) could be more than enough. The collide two RFC and this should heat them quickly to fusion temps. Even better most of that "heat" will be in the ions rather than the electrons.

And yet airline accidents have been and are far worse. Probably the up to 100 tons of volatile jet fuel on board.

But but ... 5 mile high club!!!

Or we just could get rid of faulty flesh computers in first place and have non overidable "autopilot".

Fact is, that is the only way to be sure. The certainty presented in current models is nothing short of intellectually dishonest at best.

The thing about all three of the current top gear guys is that they are utter toss pots. And its not Clarkson that has make it work. Its the producer with some of the best editing and camera work in the industry.

This is already covered. Brakes fail, tires blow out, mechanical failures happen. They kill people. Its been something that has happened plenty and gone trough the courts many times. Precedent has been set.

Its a tide. Its 5m. For an average of 2.5m.

Pump storage can't be built everywhere. And the capacity needed is insane for a a 100% renewable grid.

But they need to be about 200C to work. This is not very good for domestic applications.

Actually its not. The TFA makes the same comparison so many do with solar. That is per watt installed. Which is total bullshit. That watt of installed power will only produce 1 watt, for about 30min on just one perfectly fine day in the summer, if its in space. I like to call them brochure watts. Since real installations are probably never ever going to get that claimed watt in any real life conditions.

The average power you get out of 1GW of solar panels is at best 32% of the peak (in practice it is quite a bit lower, like 25%), and only in summer. It is much lower in the winter months, and you will often need to "time shift" all that energy.

When someone says i can give you a working toyota gearbox, i would expect it to be well a working toyota gearbox i can fit into my toyota. If they said *model* or *scale replica* then perhaps i would expect the the toy they did make with the *help* of 3d printing. You do know that car enthusiast have and do make real gear boxes without jumping on the 3d printing bandwaggon.

These 3d printer nut jobs are going around saying things like "you will be able to just print that soon" and post articles like this. It gets tiresome. 3d printing is 20 years old and it can't even print the metal case to a iPhone (its forged to get the correct micro structure). It is useful for some parts and prototyping, but stop with "printed a real working gearbox" bullshit already.

Only Americans think that every issue can be summed up with partisan politics.

2.5 is not 1/20 of 100. And still the math is way way off. Your claiming you could run *all* of Britain with the lagoon claim, while my calculations match claims that papers have made and doesn't have lots of math mistakes.