The only reason I have purchased any of the CDs I own is because of downloading them before buying to hear the entire album, to find out if it is worth buying. I have hundreds of CDs because the artists made good albums, albums worth paying for because every track was good. I would not have bought a single album if it wasn't for being able to download the tracks in FLAC before buying.
You're getting paid content for free; don't argue that point.
If one has gotten it for free, then it cannot fairly be called 'paid content'. Maybe better to say, 'content for whose use the copyright holder hoped to receive payment'.
Randall C. Kennedy was an InfoWorld blogger known for his outrageous, inflammatory posts. Often these posts appeared to disregard the facts, overinflate the issues, or otherwise ignore the tenets of basic journalism in favor of sensationalism and manufactured furor.
Combine this with the fact that the guy is already very comfortable using a pseudonym then I heartily recommend him for the post of Slashdot editor!
There are no things that user is supposed to "decide" if they should or should not be allowed to run as root/admin -- there are things that should always run as admin, and things that shouldn't.
Well, that's not really true. If you're looking at it at an executable level, then there are at least a few executables that are quite reasonably run at both privilege levels. Even at a command level, if you do "./configure --prefix=$HOME/my/install/location" then "make", then "make install" is something you'll probably be running as yourself. If you omit the --prefix part, then "make install" will need to be run as root.
Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.