Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Young most vulnerable and underskilled drivers (Score 0) 375

Motor skills and response time? The counterbalance is a lack of practical experience. There have been studies proving that old and experienced drivers tend to get involved in accidents less frequently than youngsters because, while young people may have the reflexes to react quickly to trouble, their older counterparts are much better at avoiding trouble in the first place. It often happens that, by the time a young person realizes that he has stupidly driven himself into a tight spot, it is already humanly impossible to safely steer clear of the oncoming obstacle. And no, being a great TGA player does not count as practical experience.

Comment Re:If this is true... (Score 0) 536

I don't believe anyone should forget that Nixon did some good things for his country. On the other hand, if you have done some good things, does that mean that any crimes you have committed should be granted impunity? That sounds a lot like the case of the Chilean dictator Pinochet. Pinochet's forces murdered Allende, the previous President, and during his regime lots of political dissidents were tortured and worse. But Pinochet's economic policies and his incentives for education in the country allowed Chile to emerge from the disaster that Allende's administration had been. Today, Chile is way ahead of the rest of South America in terms of economic development. So, what is your stance on a case like this?

Comment Re:Reset back to when I was younger (Score 0) 456

I'm surprised better visual acuity wasn't on the list. I really don't care about wider colour spectrum, but it would be nice to have the eyes of an eagle. Even 20/20 isn't perfect. There's many people who can see much better than 20/20. A quick google shows that some people have 20/16 or 20/12. Which means they can read something at 20 feet, which most people would have to be at 12 feet to read. Some test subjects have gone as far as 20/8. But some species of hawk are about 20/2. I wonder what it would be like to be able to see that well.

Eagles and hawks may have very sharp eyesight, but they also have a narrow field of vision. Human eyesight is a compromise between sharpness and peripheral vision. There is an XKCD cartoon that illustrates the difference between what a human can see straight in front of him and what he can distinguish out of the corner of his eye. But no, I can't recall its number (yeah, I know, hand in your geek card at the door)...

Comment Re:Hazen (Score 0) 68

So the question still stands: At some point there will be a "dead man's border" beyond which no living thing can be found. But so far, nobody has any idea how far down that border is, and for all we know it may be changing over time, as microbes evolve and new species appear with just a teeny little bit more resistance to extreme temperatures, pressure and chemically aggressive environments.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...