Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Related Anil Dash Blogs and earlier /. discussi (Score 1) 206

I have celiac and am all for research, but this site is like an example of ALL the bad practices for coding a site. Is the whole this written in deprecated HTML 3 or something? Flashing text even!!!

I refer you to the upper right corner where a banner states that the website in question is W3C validated HTML 4.0.1 (i haven't checked it, but that is what the site owner claims). However your question is irrelevant because none of the W3C standards that i know of, addresses eyesoreness.

Touche! It was a mere dry humor jest. And indeed, W3C does NOT address bad coding design practices. Perhaps it would be a good example to HTML students of how NOT to code a page. Ha Ha!

Comment Re:LOL (Score 1) 206

Freedom and open standards, sharing information for the greater good was the ethos.

No it wasn't. This is someone inventing a nostalgic version of the Internet that didn't exist. Prior to Facebook, etc. there was AOL and Compuserve which had their own "walled gardens" and gated versions of the Internet. Throughout the 90s it was a fight of both Netscape and Microsoft pushing proprietary HTML elements and the "Best viewed in Netscape" or "Best viewed in IE" nonsense.

Totally agree, as a user of not only AO-Hell and then later Compuserve (better until AOL bought it) but the short-lived Prodigy as well (TOTALLY sucked). Internet started to get a little more interesting about 2000.

Comment Re:Defective product. (Score 4, Informative) 185

I would agree that 3/4 of AV success is avoiding "dodgy" sites. However, I have never had any problems with malware on any porn site. The sites I have had problems with malware on were like pics of celebrities on Google Images, and you get a redirect to a malware driveby site, or, you lick on an ad that promises things free that should not be ... that kind of thing. I Used to AVG 2012, but when it went to 2013 it refused to activate, so I switched to Avast, and have not looked back. Higher rated and better protection.

Comment Re:Seriously? (Score 1) 302

I agree. I rarely use FF anymore. Even with all the rapid upgrades (which they practically FORCE you to accept), it is still much slower than Chrome, and if one tab fails it locks the application. Why Chrome "sandboxes" them. The annoying thing is I used FF because of the cool add-ons and extensions. Now, whenever a new version come, it KILLS all my favorite add-ons.

Comment Re:MS is out of touch unless it's with chairs (Score 1) 558

FWIW, Metro's more the UI. But anyway: would "Mass Transit System" or "City Bus Company" have been any better as names? And don't say "But what about Subway" as people in the US associate that with sandwiches made on stale hoagie rolls.

"Metro" was definitely the right choice...

Read HERE to find out why M$ had to legally CHANGE the name to "Windows 8 UI" because they wouldn't/couldn't settle with some German company.

Comment Re:Forced Upgrades? (Score 1) 665

The main difference being that those updates don't tend to kill your plugins like they do in firefox.

I would have to say I agree with you here. I use both Firefox (currently 14) and am on Chrome (Beta channel - currently 20 I think). Firefox does not FORCE you to upgrade, but annoys one to DEATH with nag screens if you do not in a timely manner. Chrome DOES upgrade in the background with no notice (I thought that was because I was on beta). But NONE of my extension in Chrome has ever died because of an upgrade. And EVERYTHING in the Chrome Store, regardless how new or old, just works in Chrome. Not so in Firefox. Every upgrade nearly ALL of my extensions and themes (especially) just die ("not compatible with this version"). Annoying. I still use both. But I would say I use Chrome 70/30 now to Firefox. Annoyed at them.

Comment Re:*zzzzzzz* (Score 1) 218

They sell Thinkpads with Linux installed for more than it costs to get them with Windows directly from Lenovo.

Okay, I thought the prices seemed high. I am new to Linux. Am just testing Ubuntu 12.04 on a USB drive to make sure I like it. I think I will. I was a DOS wizard in my day. So far I am not connecting on internet, but I have the 147 page manual. I will check it out further. From looking at the sites, I gathered the main "advantage" they pushed is that the machine's hardware was optimized for Linux. If I got a Windows machine and installed it, you are saying that would be cheaper and just as good?

Comment Re:*zzzzzzz* (Score 1) 218

I want a good laptop. Wake me up with Lenovo sells ThinkPads without Windows.

Perhaps your forgot to indicate that was sarcasm? As the poster directly above your post mentioned, The good folks at System76, Penguin Computing and Los Alamos Computing ALL sell Thinkpads with Linux installed. They seem a bit pricey considering the operating system is FREE; but supposedly the hardware is already compatible with the Linux kernel.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...