I'm thinking an expansion of the definition of GMO.

From the B&N statement linked above by eternaldoctorwho

I don't know what 'bug' means in this context, but maybe data wasn't cached, but captured in flight?

Yes it is. And it makes life for the homeless even more difficult. One of the great services some nonprofits provide is mailing addresses for the homeless.

But they keep looking: http://www.ktul.com/story/19662557/soil-samples-to-be-taken-in-hoffa-body-claim

Bullets are easy to get and require no background check, etc. And even if it's not 'useful', it's a pretty fun project.

Glad to see you made good out of a really crappy experience. Cheers!

I've always thought an excellent common ground, regardless of opinion on AGW, is that the carbon based stuff in the ground is not inexhaustible. You can even disagree on how long it's going to last, but why not plan for the inevitable and really invest in alternatives? It addresses long term supply concerns, reduces pollution, and, if you're of a certain mindset, helps keep the planet from melting. Win, win, win.

Increase the resolution and apply to fairy cake and we're good to go!

Sorry for feeding the troll, but this is from late in Bradbury's life (age 90).

Full article, worth the read:
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-08-02/living/Bradbury_1_ray-bradbury-dandelion-wine-sam-weller?_s=PM:LIVING

4. Profit?

Which, of course, is why they won't go after him. But I wonder if inaction in this case would work against them in future cases?

Two reasons it's not over: criminal vs. civil and appeals.

Sounds like they just picked the wrong law for the charges.

Oops on moderation.

Just ask Peter Graves and Tom Cruise. Well, I guess you can't ask Peter Graves anymore, but Tom Cruise is still available.