Comment Re:Climate Denial (Score -1, Troll) 987
So if someone disagrees with you (or the article) they are immediately labeled a climate denier?
Way to win an argument, might as well call them racist while you're at it.
So if someone disagrees with you (or the article) they are immediately labeled a climate denier?
Way to win an argument, might as well call them racist while you're at it.
I would love to see the Cop's thoughts on this.
You would think that an officer of the law should be well aware of what the law is and when (they are) doing something is directly violating someone's rights (especially that of a child).
I wonder how they felt intimidating a child?
facebook will find a way to monetize me and what I do beyond the purchase price of the Rift. That's what they do;
Really? What facebook products have you purchased so far?
However such misleading headline doesn't surprise me: the UN is a master of over-hyped sky-is-falling chicken-little statistics.
I would love to see the statistic about how many people will use this statistic as evidence in their next argument.
I hope this is sarcasm.
Length is important because the longer the length the harder it is to brute force.
'The trouble is elephants are too smart to be fooled by us for long.'
We're doomed.
This is obvious flame bait.
I remember we did this study in the 5th grade. It was called "Telephone". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
I know at 5 o'clock when I'm getting onto the freeway and see miles of cars standing still, then looking around at the beaten, downtrodden, frustrated and exhausted commuters that this is indeed the pinnacle of human efficiency.
They say police may enter and search when they have the consent of an occupant. Because Fernandez was not there to object, “the police acted reasonably in relying on her [Fernandez's girlfriend’s] consent to search the premises,” Karlin wrote.
And by this logic, if noone is there to object they can search at will?
Why not let your employees telecommute.
Seriously, how many people working there actually *have* to be there to perform some job function? I'm willing to bet most could easily work remotely.
This will help traffic. No commute for the employee, and less traffic on the road for those that really do need to be on-site.
The employee get's to live where they want to live.
The "green" crowd is happy because of less greenhouse gasses and consumption of energy.
The business will not have to house so many people, will save on utility bills, office supplies, insurance and rent - lowering operating costs.
The only people this does not appeal to is the boss-man fucktard overlord types that need to see an army of people sitting beneath them slaving feverishly away at killing time and trying to look busy.
How else are they going get their ego boost?
Screw it. Might as well give up and end it all now, knowing that there may be a mass extinction sometime between 5,000 and 60,000 years from now. What's the point?
At some point wouldn't it just be easier to remove the classification altogether?
I think they did.
It's like Sex Wax surfboard wax. Did the creators really think it was actually intended to be used for sex?
Damn it. I've been doing it wrong.
Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek