Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Social Networks

The Ethics of Social Games 75

Gamespot is running a story about the ethics and morality of the social games market, which in recent years has exploded to involve hundreds of millions of players. Between micro-transactions, getting players to recruit friends, and the thin line between compelling games and addictive games, there are plenty of opportunities for developers to stray into shady practices. Quoting: "The most successful social games to date have used very simple gameplay mechanics, encouraging neither strategy nor dexterity but regular interaction with the game ... Although undeniably successful, the existing social game framework has been the subject of much debate among game developers from every corner of the game industry, from the mainstream to the indie community. Some, like Super Meat Boy creator Edmund McMillen, are particularly strident in their assessment. 'Social games tend to have a really seedy and abusive means of manipulation that they use to rope people in and keep them in,' McMillen said. 'People are so tricked into that that they'll actually spend real money on something that does absolutely nothing, nothing at all.'

Comment Re:What the hell is the fuss about (Score 1) 309

"With all due respect, I believe you are being dishonest for the sake of argumentation."

Nope.

"Feelings towards loved ones don't just magically disappear at the moment of death."

I never said that they did. You should, however, care more about the memories of the person than the persons dead body which they will no longer have a use for. If it could be used to help others rather than just rot in the ground or be burnt into ashes, why not (again, I know that this wasn't the case here)? There's no sense to this.

It doesn't have to be rational. Unless you believe that Humans are 100% rational beings , and would see a corpse for what it is.

Attaching emotions to things is part of being human. Ignoring all non-rational dimensions of human nature is being illogical.

"Unless you don't have any feelings to begin with, which is still a possibility. By being a psychopath, for instance."

I suppose being different is always a possibility, but I don't really fit into this criteria.

"Psychopath" was of course not meant as an insult. Psychopaths are among the most rational of individuals, since they are not being influenced by emotions nor conscience.

Comment Re:What the hell is the fuss about (Score 1) 309

I won't pretend to speak for the GP, but I feel I should point out that a loved one and a corpse are different things. If you really believe that the person you loved is gone when they die, there is no real reason to have feelings about the shell left behind.

And what you are saying (both of you & the GP), has only the appearance of logic.

If you truly believe that a loved one is gone, then that "shell" is about only concrete in-flesh thing left of him/her. It has his/her face & his/her body.

Saying that you don't have any feelings for that shell is bizarre.

Doesn't a photograph of your gone loved one spark any emotion? But a photograph & the actual person it represents are two completely different things. And a dead body of a person who just died is more tangible than that photograph.

Comment Re:What the hell is the fuss about (Score 5, Insightful) 309

"Cool; so when someone close to you dies they wont mind if I come along and urinate on their body before the funeral?"

Not really. They're dead, why would I care?

With all due respect, I believe you are being dishonest for the sake of argumentation. Feelings towards loved ones don't just magically disappear at the moment of death.

Unless you don't have any feelings to begin with, which is still a possibility. By being a psychopath, for instance.

Comment The Incredible Hulk - new & improved. (Score 1) 116

From the article: "These cells not only repaired the injury, but they caused the treated muscle to increase in size by 170 percent."

Here comes the New Incredible Hulk. No need for gamma rays, nor anger feed to turn into a green monster. Gone the urge to get new large clothes after each transformation..

The New Hulk version 2.0 doesn't turn green. He has gone through several stem cells injections, he stays big, and doesn't need anger management classes... But it will be still quite unwise to piss him off.

Comment Yet Another Meaningless Research (Score 2, Insightful) 155

What possibly could be remotely important about this study?

Basically, the researcher made a completely arbitrary "evolutionary" assumption that the view of meat provoked "blood lust", despite any evidence to that. And then he stood corrected after wasting funds on that largely irrelevant issue. Blood lust didn't help our ancestors hunt, hunger did. It would seem way more logical to most people - except to that researcher, obviously - that the view of meat would calm them, since it meant "dinner's (almost?) ready".

The view of meat could provoke anger with some people like veggie activists, but this has nothing to do with our ancestors hunting for food, IMO.

Comment Potter's fans or Hindu rituals? (Score 1) 252

Blaming Harry Potter or its fans doesn't seem to have much to do with the problem of disappearing owls, since the article itself mentions big Hindu festivals where the birds are sacrificed.

What's the threat here exactly, some kids taking owls as pets, or crowds of religious fanatics killing these birds in offerings to their gods?

Comment Google's response (Score 1) 675

For those who are interested, here's a blog that discusses in more details the matter & Google's response.

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20101005114201136

Google's answer with counterclaims. Like a declaration that the Oracle’s claims be barred by the doctrine of "unclean hands" (i.e. bad faith), and for Oracle to pay Google's attorney fees for that invalid lawsuit.

Comment Re:Libya != Africa? (Score 2, Informative) 91

The point is that these primate fossils show that they might have colonized Africa from somewhere else. Why? Because of the sudden appearance of such diversity while there is no earlier fossil evidence.

The most likely place would be Asia. Why? Probably because of the earlier findings of old fossils there and that one of the Libyan anthropoids resembled one found in Asia.

Comment Not just fraud (Score 2, Insightful) 38

Apart from that specific article, the more important point IMO is that IQT's mission is not just "fraud", but whatever is supposed to serve "national security". The latter being increasingly used as an excuse to monitor as many people as possible.

In 2009 for example, IQT invested in a company called "Visible Technologies" which specialized in social media monitoring & tracking, such as the monitoring of blog posts or tweets. Another company IQT invested in, "Recorded Future" , extracted "time and event information from the Web". Another one would be "Attensity, with its own web 2.0-monitoring service.etc...

Nothing really new here: extensive Web monitoring & electronic surveillance by Big Brother in the name of cybersecurity. Dubious overall efficiency but enormous potential for privacy violations.

Comment Re:Big business corruption and greed is anti-scien (Score 1) 277

Maybe Big Business is not so good for science, but still most tech innovations are done primarily in the private sector. The state is actually a much bigger obstacle to scientific research.

In "The Economic Laws of Scientific Research", Keeley showed with backed data (stats from OECD countries,) that gov-funded R&D is wasteful, and appears to reduce overall R&D spending, thereby causing slower economic growth.

Publicly funded science is ineffective compared to the private sector, although the latter is far from being perfect.

And since we're talking about Canada, an anecdotal evidence of the thesis above is the deplorable present state of Canadian fisheries where R&D are managed by the DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans) .

Comment Re:Why the paywall won't work (Score 1) 193

Newspapers make the bulk of their money from selling ad space, not with subscription fees.

If the same news are available elsewhere for free, then subscription fees are useless. If that was not the case, if the NYT had worthwhile content unavailable anywhere else that would make readers keep coming back, then yes, this could work. I don't see that being the case, IMO.

Comment Technology & Strategy (Score 1) 317

All that is fine & dandy, but the major problem for the US forces in Afghanistan isn't energy, but a lack of strategy, IMO.

Talibans don't have F-16 nor drones, they don't have solar panels, and they still control over 90% of the country.

Example of bad strategy is fuel trucks crossing the Khyber Pass, historically well-known & pretty well-suited for ambush. Just ask the British who lost an army there in the nineteenth century.

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...