I see your point.
Of course models have limits. Science itself has limits, that's all I know. I plead ignorant as I am not a scientist of sort, I don't have a scientific education background and my maths grades were awful in high school so I don't believe I have many chances (will and time) to understand the science behind models and so on.
However, I profoundly doubt whatever comes out of the Heartland's mouths as they are notorious for warping information for corporate gain and I respect the work of thousands of climate scientists around the world whose independent research is pointing out - whatever the differences - to one conclusion.

Do you know who the Heartland are?

One dumb human trick when they see a tiger is trying run away. Of course they don't know that we tigers can run way faster than them and we always manage to catch them. The funny thing is that when you finally claw them they still try to fight! I, as a tiger, I am not entirely sure humans know they are alive, let alone feel pain. I think I'll have human steak for dinner tonight.

Why not? If you then get a job in a related field I have nothing to object. It's full of weirdos out there, some with a weirdo PhD would only be easily recognisable. However, I wouldn't be that happy if you chose to teach my children.

The Hockey Stick graph is not something you believe in or not. It is data records backed by most of the most prestigious scientific bodies in the world. Besides, it is just one of the countless elements used in trying to explain why our climate is changing so rapidly in such a short amount of time. To dismiss the theory of anthropogenic climate change, it's not enough to counter one of the points. You'll have to counter most of them and offer a better explanation.

Sure, the Earth was much hotter when dinosaurs were around. Then again, it was a climate which suited them. Homo Sapiens evolved in a cooler climate. If there's a chance we can prevent the global climate from going back to the time of dinosaurs, why not acting?

True, but the same risks - minus the radioactive waste - applies whenever you build a nuclear power station.

Parent is all but a troll. If you disagree with parent, it doesn't mean he's a troll. If you disagree with parent please write down your ideas (not that I care) or shut up.

I also agree with most of what you say except one thing:

Yes, only that "envirowackos" have been pushing for renewable energy for decades now.