Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What are you looking for, really? (Score 2) 490

Having an browser installed does not make a PC any less or more secure, it has been proven recently that most versions of IE have major vulnerabilities (just ask Google).

Really? Having any random browser installed does not make a PC any less or more secure? Please, please tell me you are not in any way affiliated with any environment subject to federal regulations.

Prime example:
Let us say your environment is exclusively a MS shop. You have all the development resources, security resources, and vendor support to ensure that environment is safe, secure, and compatible with your applications. Then, bam, a problem shows up. Joe User cannot use X web application. Security starts seeing strange traffic coming across the network, traffic that is malicious in nature. Lo and behold, that is because Joe User installed a browser not supported within the organization, which, in this case, happens to be copy of Firefox 3.5 (http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox36.html). Suddenly, your organization has just been hacked, corporate data is being siphoned off the network, federal regulators are crawling down your boss's throat, the organization gets hit with a huge fine and other costs related to the data breach, and why?

Because you believed that installing any old browser on any system in any environment doesn't make the PC any more or less secure.

Moral of the story? Don't be a fucking idiot, and understand the need for prioritization and standardization within a corporate network, especially one of those corporate networks that is subject to regulatory oversight regarding information technology.

Comment Re:Web Interface (Score 1) 460

Never worked on one, have you?

If you did, then you would know that directly linking through Cat5 doesn't work. The serial cable that Cisco ships with their gear may have an RJ45 end on it, but it ain't anywhere near Cat5.

Not too mention that whole cable-terminates-in-a-serial-end thing. But hey, I guess you you are smarter than the engineers that say "ship this cable with our gear".

Comment Re:PAE? (Score 1) 334

Seriously, PAE? Come on now...

Even with PAE, then yes, you get the privilege of having your 32-bit OS running on 64-bit hardware access more than 4GB of RAM, but why? Haven't gotten a working crack of Win7?

At this point in the game, those that still run 32-bit OS's on hardware from 2 standard lifecycles ago just need to give it up and stop. 64-bit is where it is at.

Comment Re:How about changing it to "XSucksALittleLess" (Score 2, Interesting) 356

Won't ever happen as long as I continue to have conversations like with their "tech" support:

Comcast rep: I don't see any problems in your area
Me: Please check again. I am seeing high lag, dropped packets, and randow route changes in the Comcast network.
Comcast rep: Everything's okay within 750' of your location.
Me: The problem isn't there, its further out Actually, it's at [ip address] which is [hostname], and is probably near [address]
Comcast rep: Wow, how did you see that?
Me: Traceroute
Comcast rep: I need to learn to do that

Submission + - Microsoft will debut Windows Mobile 7 at MWC (businessweek.com)

CSHARP123 writes: Business Week is reporting, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer may give the world a sneak peek at Windows Mobile 7 next week during a press conference at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. Ballmer is scheduled to meet with reporters at 9 a.m. Eastern Time on Monday to discuss Windows phones, according to a Microsoft statement.
Here is the link for Ballmer hosting Windows Phone Conference

Slashdot Top Deals

We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his own facts. -- Patrick Moynihan

Working...