Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Wireless Networking

Has 2.4 GHz Reached Maximum Capacity? 250

An anonymous reader writes "There's been a lot of talk lately about the concept of Personal Area Networks. At CES Intel and Connectify both released software that turns Windows laptops into Access Points for file transfers, wirelessly syncing pictures from cameras, and Internet sharing. This is good, maybe great, if you're a road warrior, but what about the rest of us holed up in apartment buildings and small neighborhoods? We already have to deal with the wireless chatter of the 50 or so other Linksys routers in the vicinity. What will happen when every laptop also acts as a software router? To add fuel to the fire, Intel and Netgear also announced the Push2TV device that allows you to stream your display, including Netflix videos straight to your television. Isn't this going to kill lower powered 2.4 GHz devices, like Bluetooth mice and headsets? When does the 2.4 GHz band collapse completely? Why can't we push all this short range, high bandwidth stuff onto 5 GHz?"

Comment Re:Management Types... (Score 1) 323

Yes... and as a company, they... and not a bunch of pixels on the internet, get to determine what they do with their property. As long as they do not violate any laws when (hopefully, its the Jack Benny show for god's sake) they destroy them, ain't nothing wrong with what they are doing.

Thank you Eskarel for that post. Seriously.

Comment Re:Are you serious, or just killing time? (Score 1) 268

True enough... as an employee of one of those ISP-types you mention, I will absolutely say our Cisco-certifed engineers are worth their weight in gold. Why? 'cause when something breaks, or when some copyright holder comes to us and says some dumbass kid broke copyright by downloading a movie, those guys can tell me who, what, when, where, and how ... right before they make sure it never happens again.

And that, to me, is worth every bloody cent they get paid. Every. Bloody. Cent.

Comment Re:Remember the (Score 1) 421

Though I happen to agree with you regarding arenas of free speech... it is important to note that there is no expectation of anonymity on the internet.

Sure, there are tools to help increase one's anonymity such as TOR, etc... but no internet traffic is truly anonymous, thus no speech of the internet is truly anonymous.

The expectations of free speech should always be guaranteed through legislation at the host provider's physical location. Thus, as an example, if the traffic is sourced in China, but the company providing the boards said speech is located London, UK, the local laws governing whether or not that information may be removed/traced/etc MUST be local to London, UK.

To do less, is to undermine the strength of the local preservation of free speech... for, though the internet is important, crucial, and a vital part of our lives, it is no where nearly as important as the the right to utilize the voicebox in your throat.

Comment Re:Open Office is there (Score 1) 179

We had the server in our development side of the house, just sitting there idle on a dedicated piece of hardware.

It was literally a switch in cabling, and folks adding Lightning to Thunderbird, and bam, scheduling became *much* easier.

Since the new integrated solution (email, calendar, knowledge management, service management, and project management) is at most 3 months away, and will require folks to use a different client to interface the system anyway, this was an acceptable temporary solution.

But hey, AC, keep on trollin', instead of discussin'.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...