Comment Re:Logical Consequences (Score 1) 398
heck, we didn't respond to an unarmed invasion - why would response to an armed invasion be any more robust?
heck, we didn't respond to an unarmed invasion - why would response to an armed invasion be any more robust?
naval power is kind of a joke in unlimited war. even modern FAEs could wipe out a carrier battle group very quickly, ignoring tactical nukes.
That pretty much describes Japan nowadays.
Anyhow, it would be criminal not to arm with nukes, given China's aggressive posture.
history doesn't repeat. it merely rhymes.
what passes for "reality" in GB is a sad, soggy cardboard puppet theatre. would you like some tony blair with your crisps?
he advised the disciples to arm themselves on one recorded occasion. like everything else he said there's about a 99% chance that the meaning is not obvious to the naive reader.
There is now.
Regardless of evidence.
Legislating what is science is a very very bad idea. To cast this is stark terms: Argument from evidence has been outlawed in Great Britain.
I would point out that many creationists are both atheists and scientists.
in other words, if you want slow, use python
it's not increased productivity if you can't use it. it's just a spurious external dependency.
you're the runner up
whereas in python, the bugs just never get fixed. try reimplementing eclipse in python, including the ability to actually use it.
Whitespace: minutes to learn, aeons to master.
> There's been more money to be made with Objective-C
Only for the mediocre. For skilled persons, most of the money has been in matlab.
"Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery.'" -- Comedian Jay Leno