Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I knew it. (Score 1) 455

Just on seatbelts... in an accident, if you're not wearing a seatbelt then you're a missile in my car. Quite possibly on a ballistic trajectory that intersects with my windscreen or my head. You wear a seatbelt or you get out of my car. And if you're driving, you're still a missile in an accident if you don't wear a seatbelt, and still as likely to be a missile on a ballistic trajectory that intersects your windscreen or my head. Wear a damned seatbelt.

Comment Re:Canon or Nikon (Score 1) 569

The one caveat I'd add to this is -- at least in the Nikon world where I live -- that you probably need to decide up-front on sensor size. Yes, you can put a DX lens on an FX body, but you're not using the full-size sensor to its capacity. Some people might be perfectly fine with owning both FX and DX gear -- a small DX body with a couple of lenses is pretty easy to lug around and you can save the FX and big glass for other jobs -- but not everyone wants to spend that sort of money on it. OP, definitely look into an SLR system. And as others have said, it's hard to go wrong with Canon or Nikon. I went Nikon (only because I already had a couple of lenses), but I otherwise might have been just as happy with a Canon. SLR gives you a metric arse-load of flexibility. I've shot stuff on my D3 that I would never have been able to shoot on a wee point-and-shoot thing.

Comment Re:Canon or Nikon (Score 1) 569

Absolutely. I'm no pro, and I do like to buy (albeit infrequently) prosumer-grade stuff, but having said that I would totally recommend an SLR. And "but I've gotten to the point where the images produced by my smartphone aren't cutting it" is very unlikely to stop at just-better-than-smartphone-camera. If all you want is something that's only better than a smartphone, then you'd just save the money and make do with a smartphone.
Power

Submission + - Belgium to abolish nuclear power (reuters.com)

AmiMoJo writes: "Belgium's political parties have reached a conditional agreement to shut down the country's two remaining nuclear power stations. Older reactors will be decommissioned by 2015, with the final closures happening before 2025. The exit is conditional on alternatives being available. "If it turns out we won't face shortages and prices would not skyrocket, we intend to stick to the nuclear exit law of 2003," a spokeswoman for Belgium's energy and climate ministry said."

Comment Re:Easy reason (Score 1) 533

Let me try something...

It only takes one aspergers inflicted admin to make a good long term contributer throw their hands up in the air and say "fuck that shit".

Instead, try: "It only takes one aspergers inflicted user to make a good long term admin throw their hands up in the air and say "fuck that shit". Not that I'm casting aspersions, but is this going on, too?

Comment Way to go, Pakistan! (Score 1) 185

Memo Australian Government: this is how you make your intergoogle filter work. It comes with the advantage of completely screwing up any credible e-commerce in the country, too, which is handy when you want your economy to be all about being someone else's quarry.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...