Comment but I must put more of it on bad teachers (Score 1) 285
I was going to comment, but I get tired of being chastized for 'correcting the teacher.'
Did you even bother to proofread your post? Or was it your purpose to obfuscate?
I was going to comment, but I get tired of being chastized for 'correcting the teacher.'
Did you even bother to proofread your post? Or was it your purpose to obfuscate?
...does not mean the Government can break into your house and read the copy you made. Conversely, the fact that the recipient of the mail does not have Fourth Amendment rights in the copy does not mean that the government can break into the recipient's house to read the original.
Further, the sender does not give up any copyright protection and it does not mean the recipient can copy or has copyright protection, but that the recipient has the responsibility to refuse to copy for third-parties i.e., "Sam."
What an insightful way to show that YOU get the reference without actually giving ANY information to others on what the reference is. Jackass.
I did not mean to impute; however, and after having been modded 'Troll,' in retrospect: Point taken.
Now, shall we dispense with this business of stoning and getting stoned...?
*It* highly improbable that the ignoramus poster (and countless thousands of others) committed a mere typographical error by missing exactly those *two* key presses to form...
Methinks thou doth propense as such (making your own case-in-point?)
I guess most slashdot readers never read that story.
Until presently, I'd always assumed it was a requirement for membership.
Sadly, it has occurred to me just now, that story was indeed in book form
and therefore is likely no longer considered pertinent by trolls and the like.
Saliva causes cancer, but only if swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time. -- George Carlin