What do they call these nervous nellies who constantly monitor their pulse and blood pressure, hyperventilate with the least bit of excitement? It's kinda like 'helicopter' parents, but they 'hover' over themselves. *I've fallen! And I can't get up!*
Humans.
"All your new crap is named after Halo and Minecraft so nobody will respect it."
Is that considered a bug?
"Bug closed: Issue only affects small portion of user base with mental age = 12"
Part of the requirements to be paid a bounty is following the "responsible disclosure policy". The submitter did not follow that policy and therefore did not get paid. It seems pretty simple.
I always make it even simpler, by citing my Greedy Bastard Policy regardless of what anyone does.
Holy shit, you're a fucking moron. I'm not sure it can be stated any more clearly than that. Pardon my French.
Calamine lotion as a treatment for chickenpox? Are you fucking high?
Calamine doesn't "treat" chicken pox - it treats the symptoms of the disease. That is, the itching and the rash. It's not a drug that fights off the virus.
Next time I get a serious viral infection I'll just rub some zinc carbonate on my skin. Much better than vaccinating myself.
Jesus fucking christ you anti-vaxxers are unbelievable.
If there is a drug that will make you more productive to your employer, it will be embraced and encouraged.
Mayhap this explains the Fermi Paradox.
And of course, no "alternative to Mendeley" list would be complete without Endnote. (Although it's somewhat interesting that Mendeley started as "the alternative to Endnote" - I guess it's come full circle.
So, with your expert knowledge of the situation, how do you propose to make the thing hover when the TWR is 1.8 at minimum thrust?
Just curious.
The vertical speed was also planned. How do you propose to control the rocket's attitude with the fins when it's moving very slowly, since they rely on airspeed to function?
Let me guess, you just assumed that "hover slowly and touch down like a helicopter" was the desired descent profile without looking anything up?
That large explosion at the end of the longer video implies there was plenty of fuel left over.
You would assume that, yes. But a) that's mainly the fuel vapour in the near-empty main tanks, and b) the fuel the GP is talking about is the pressurisation of the hydraulic lines for the control systems that run the thrusters and fins, not the fuel that runs the rocket engine.
Is there something wrong with the driver Nvidia supplies?
This is about the open source driver, not the proprietary one that Nvidia ships for Linux that works just as well as the windows one that they ship for Windows.
They licence some of the IP involved in the hardware that does not belong to them. It's not as simple as just letting it out with no restrictions.
What else did you want them to do to prove they were taking the exploit seriously?
Well I'm not writing a book for you, and someone else already covered an example.
Why don't you tell me the answer to your questions.
This isn't a test. What is this? High school?
The fact that you're being acutely defensive suggests to me that you just wanted to engage in some good old fashioned Microsoft bashing with nothing constructive to add in the safety of slashdot.
As far as how I would answer my own question, based on my original assertion that they have already taken it seriously; nothing.
However, since you suggested that they have not taken the exploit seriously enough, I wondered how exactly our positions differed (since I can't read your mind) and what exactly they would have to do so that you and I agreed that they were taking it seriously enough.
Remember, I already think they are taking it seriously enough based on the release of patches back to win 7 and a workaround given for non-patched machines, so my answer is "nothing", but that clearly can't be your answer because otherwise we'd agree.
I think you missed my sarcasm.
I was continuing the riff, you know, because Bill Paxton was not in ID4 and Will Smith was, thus proving the point that Will Smith clearly played all the...
Never mind.
I'll put a giant "this is a joke" disclaimer next time.
Here's your obligatory: "Whoosh".
I'll explain the joke: people seem to get confused between Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton. (And apparently so did you; Paxton was NOT in Independence Day.)
The OP wrote Bill Paxton, and given the length of the post, I assume the mistake was intentional. The standard response is, of course, that "Bill Pullman was in Independence Day, not Bill Paxton". The poster you quoted then took the standard response and twisted it around by correctly naming an actor other than Pullman who was in Independence Day.
It's of course no longer funny since I had to explain it, but it seemed necessary.
I think you missed my continuation of the theme, or was it too subtle?
Bill Paxton was amazing in Independence Day!
Will Smith was in Independence Day, not Bill Paxton...
Today I learned that if one actor stars in a film then no one else starred in it.
I'm against "withholding details" if anything there should be an established web page that release the exploit as soon as it is found FORCING M$ and Apple to take it more seriously.
char request1[] = "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: stuff\r\nRange: bytes=0-18446744073709551615\r\n\r\n";
How are they not taking it seriously? The summary mentions that patches are already available, plus a method to prevent the exploit occurring on a non-patched machine.
What else did you want them to do to prove they were taking the exploit seriously?
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
