Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I pay 11 cents per kWh (Score 4, Informative) 151

You should note that, despite what many believe, we don't really "subsidize" fossil fuels to any major degree. The majority of the "subsidies" people whine about are just plain old tax deductions - the same ones that other businesses get. The oil companies didn't even get those deductions for a long time, and people complained when they finally got to deduct for exploration and drilling expenses in the same way normal businesses deduct for operations.

Bullshit:

http://www.nei.org/corporatesite/media/filefolder/60_Years_of_Energy_Incentives_-_Analysis_of_Federal_Expenditures_for_Energy_Development_-_1950-2010.pdf

http://www.elistore.org/Data/products/d19_07.pdf

Comment Re:Sweet sweet copyright justice (Score 1) 242

I eagerly awate assemblerex's demand for Voltage Pictures to be compensated millions of dollars for the bittorrented distribution of The Hurt Locker. I bring this up as someone who was employed on that film, and note that that money pays my salary on the next film...

Well how about you get 50% of the profits that were made by everyone who distributed The Hurt Locker over BitTorrent.

That would come to... carry the one... uh, nothing. You get zero dollars. Wow, Who'da thunk it that there's a difference between pirating something for profit and pirating something for personal use.

Comment I'm amazed it's taken them this long (Score 1) 216

Though this is probably a sign they've been able to determine the extent of some of the data leakage, otherwise it's unlikely they'd release anything on the off-chance it was something that hadn't already been leaked to Glenn Greenwald. I wonder how much of the information they release will be disinformation? One way the NSA can turn this to their advantage is using it for obfuscation and misdirection.

Comment Re:welcome to the socialist wonderland (Score 1) 206

While the US may have higher average income than Australia, Australia doesn't have the crippling poverty issues that the US does, there's a lot less income inequality and the cost differences are largely the result of corporate gouging, where additional taxes etc come into it, it's mostly luxury goods. All in all Australians have some of the highest quality of life in the world.

Comment Re:I don't think encoding/decoding are fundamental (Score 1) 182

I had this argument in another thread just yesterday. The laws of thermodynamics are obviously wrong. Wrong in the same way that Newtonian physics is wrong. Meaning that it is close enough for anything I will ever get my hands on, but that it clearly does not explain everything that is happening, and it is clearly violated at some point.

The day the 2nd law of thermodynamics is proved wrong is the day one of Stalin's descendants goes back in time, kills Stalin, then returns to his own time and spends the rest of the day playing catch with his son in a world where Stalin never came to power.

Comment Re:I don't think encoding/decoding are fundamental (Score 1) 182

I used to adhere to the Theory of Entropy. Made sense at the time kinda like the flat world and Earth being the center of everything.

With a greater understanding of Physics and Cosmology, I've come to realize that the Earth is not flat nor the center of everything. With the realization that Energy is neither created nor destroyed only converted - the Theory of Entropy is disrupted in my mind and therefore proven false.

Uh, there is no "Theory of Entropy", entropy is a phenomena described in Information Theory. Maybe next time you set out to disprove a theory, make sure it's a real theory first.

Comment Re:I don't think encoding/decoding are fundamental (Score 1) 182

In the first paragraph he's saying that it's unnecessary to think of information as encoded as matter and energy, because from the universe's perspective energy and matter is information and it's all being processed at the bit level. (although it's actually the information level, because it's not binary, so no bits involved)

In the second paragraph he's saying that measuring this information as it's processed could be useful as it would allow us to model physical interactions with near perfect accuracy, but we'd have to come up with our own way of encoding this information into format we can manipulate.

If I understand your argument, you're speculating that the universe is a pantheistic, evolving computation seeking entropy?

It's a mistake to think of the computational universe model as having agency. It's just the idea that since all activity in the universe can be abstracted as information (this is the foundation of quantum mechanics), then every interaction is a computation.

tl;dr: The universe laughs at your tiny minds and their ideas of magical superhumans and information that cannot be known. Ho ho ho.

Comment Re:I don't think encoding/decoding are fundamental (Score 2) 182

this is starting to sound interesting. could you elucidate please?

There's a number of things he could mean; but my guess is he's thinking of the digital model of a computational universe, which clashes with thermodynamics in a number of ways as opposed to the quantum model, which doesn't. (provided we figure out the whole quantum gravity debacle)

If you're interested I recommend you pick up Seth Lloyd's Programming the Universe. It's a great introduction to QM and quantum computing and is totally accessible for anyone with a high school education.

Comment Re:The real issue: U.S. government corruption. (Score 1) 555

The only good advice to TrueCrypt users is to actually have a hidden partition and to immediately hand over the keys for it when asked at a border inspection. Anything else is is pure folly. http://xkcd.com/538/ applies without restriction.

I disagree thoroughly. If you're travelling then encrypt your disk, but don't keep any personal files on your machine whatsoever, store it all in encrypted archives and upload it.

Comment Re:Down the line... (Score 3, Interesting) 248

if you kill the viability of the ad to any serious degree, you can expect some kind of consequential change on the horizon.

Collapse of the broadcast entity? Why would I have a problem with this? The “broadcast entity” is the favoured medium of the copyright cartels, who’re doing their best to make the interaction between artist and audience as painful as possible so they can continue on in their role as intermediary. At the same time like any business they want to maximise their profits and minimize their risk. Only “risk” here takes the form of investing in new content, meaning that originality and experimentation are deemed as negative values.

The collapse of the broadcast entity would speed up the disintermediation between artist and audience and expose new streams of revenue and financing. We’d end up with more artists making more money, producing more content that costs less.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...