It is when it tells people what [not] to believe.
Fundamental atheists have zero respect for tolerating other people's different belief -- they arrogantly assume theirs is the "correct" one.
Considering Science by definition is amoral where else would they get it from?
Politics?
Philosophy?
>> "As a mystic I have _knowledge_ by definition, aka experience."
> false. Completly(sic) and utterly false
Only an idiot attempts to tell another person what they have experienced. Quit being an idiot -- you are smarter then that.
> so now you are saying you have special vision no one else has? Hoe(sic) convenient.
1. Show me _where_ I made the claim that I was the _only_ one who could see??
2. Do you even understand the word: Analogy ??
> which is why we ask for proof.
Proof of what _exactly_? God? As I said before, There is NO proof except experience.
Did you completely fail to understand the analogy that _playing_ the drums IS proof that you _know_ how to play the drums ??
How exactly do you propose Atheists have an experience about something they have no belief in?? They dismiss _all_ actions_ that are needed such as prayer and meditation; their mind is closed. Not even an NDE would convince them that a higher reality exists -- only death, but by then it will be too late.
Nay, the only proof I will give is that "First" contact will happen by 2024.
> lowly science student
There is nothing lowly about someone curious to learn. Curiosity is a gift; using your mind is good.
I believe the primary reasons are more likely to do with distance and communication.
But there's no reason to believe that.
The idea of trying to manage a network of stores across the country when communication was by post or expensive phone calls just simply didn't make sense.
What? Why not? Cars are expensive items, phone calls are minimal by comparison. If you have an order for a car, you drop the form in the post. At least, they did back then.
In fact, the reasons are as stated. The manufacturers want to make cars at X dollars, which requires building Y cars. Right now there are cars which can't be sold piled up all over the world, for reasons like these and others (e.g. "the economy, stupid")
I was at home with a bad cold a couple of weeks ago when the internet exploded with hate against me over some kind of EULA situation that I had nothing to do with.
Yeah, some kind of EULA situation, like basically outlawing for-pay Minecraft services including hosting, selling packages of items, etc. In short, making most of the best MC servers illegal. The fact that he has nothing to do with it any more suggests that he should indeed uninvolve himself.
Itâ(TM)s not about the money. Itâ(TM)s about my sanity.
He's still a hypocrite given his explosion of hate over Oculus Rift, especially after this statement. He deserves our derision, and he's getting it.
Agreed. Beautiful logic!
Q. What are lawyers good for?
A. They make used car salesmen look good!
Q. What does molds, ooze, pond scum, lawyers, and used car salesman have in common?
A. They're all slime.
Q. What's the difference between a car salesman and a computer salesman?
A. The car salesman knows he's lying!
> sane entity management
Care to explain more please?
> 25MHz 486 and 640x480 VGA with no acceleration?
Before you get flamed
Dos Doom used @ 320x200 in ModeY, Quake supported Michael Abrash's ModeX @ 320x240.
Doom95 which ran on Windows 95 supported different resolutions.
I played it on my 386SX 16 MHz with the screen shrunk down a few levels. It was silky smooth on the Pentium 90 MHz, and the Pentium Pro 200 MHz (obviously) as was Quake.
Reference: http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Asp...
Sorry, what's an "RO filter"?
Reverse osmosis, which uses water pressure both to push water through a plastic membrane (the osmosis part) but also to back-flush the filter. An "efficient" RO filter wastes about 10 parts of water for each 1 part filtered, but we have a well and a septic system so no harm done really.
And you know what Mojang's opinion means at this point? Absolutely NOTHING. They can't tell their new owner to honor their intended promises, even if it were written into the deal. All they have to do is replace the boss with someone willing to change the company on Microsoft's behalf and POOF! It's happened with every other developer that's been bought out thus far that came out and said they were told/promised nothing would be changing.
Depends on how good their lawyers are. If they write into the contract a term that says that all rights revert to the original authors if the new owner violates such a term, then yes, they can force the new owners to honor those promises.
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.
