Keep all the complex interfaces and code if you need them, but put them behind very small paravirtualization codebase ingrained into the OS which keeps them isolated -- from the core system, and from each other. Really, even your devices like USB controllers and NICs can be treated as untrusted in this way if you have an IOMMU. And you can have it in a normal desktop GUI.
Kernel-implemented security is a failure; Its ridiculous to go through continued years & decades of pain by relying on it and worrying about breakouts from its weak sandboxing tactics.
"Lawful intercept" has entered the business models of Verisign and CISCO. I would not trust CISCO... http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/...
Not even an inch... http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
Proper security on a network is properly done at the endpoints. Its doesn't belong anywhere else.
What is Mozilla thinking?? They could help fund Convergence.io. They could implement clever ways to get it to ride on existing social networks. They could look at network privacy layers that use public keys as addresses. There are options for improving privacy that don't involve elevating the PKi clusterf*ck any further.
This is the one thing QubesOS could use to improve its security-by-isolation approach: Detection and repair in VMs. Even if you assume the hypervisor stays safe (and therefore, your trusted VMs stay safe), you're still relying on VMs to get everything done and the VMs doing the risky tasks are vulnerable to attack. It would be nice if those less-trusted VMs could get automatically restored after a successful attack.
Now I don't have to read the books.
Turn in your
No that would be Gladia Solaria in The Naked Sun and Robots Of Dawn.
Then write someone else in... Anyone else who would make a statement.
There are no privileged routers (or 'guard' nodes) on I2P, and from the perspective of "relays" I2P has many times the number Tor has.
Its way better than Tor when you're looking mainly to communicate with other anon sites/users. Comes with bittorrent and an option for decentralized (serverless) securemail.
Its dumbasses like you that think "As long as you are voting for the lesser of two evils you are making a difference"
There is such a thing as a protest vote, "dumbass".
Showing up to vote is critically important. At the very least it ensures the authorities will have to do the dirty, dirty work of physically turning people away if they have been purged from the rolls.
I see... No 'large infrastructure' projects within the hive.
Read these Linus quotes: http://linux.slashdot.org/stor...
He is absolutely correct.
As a (primarily desktop) Linux user since 1998, the unfolding of this debacle is starting to look like an example of why Linux distros in general lack appeal in the desktop space. Desktop/laptop users can't 'make do' with server architecture; there isn't enough veritcal integration of the powerful features we need. When layers represented by systemd and wayland must be considered swappable, the more talented users turn off to the possiblity of building stable user-facing applications on that platform.
One bit of advice is, don't be such primadonnas. Like the laptop users, you'll have to explain to the world which workflows and features are getting broken by these recent changes. OTOH, if all that's getting 'broken' is your philosophy then you might want to take a step back and consider that a better (if larger) one may have replaced it.
Memory fault - where am I?