I would expect code produced under the influence to have more bugs, less comments and generally be an unmaintainable mess.
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion man.
What about all the companies that use older versions of IE because of compatibility with their own proprietary web applications?
Simple: they'll disable the automatic update, by force if necessary.
Realistically, though, these users tend to be behind corporate firewalls with lots of antivirus protection and a forced patch schedule, so I doubt Microsoft is too worried about them contributing significantly to continued security holes thanks to IE6. This is an update to save the clueless from themselves.
How the hell could the case be dismissed?
Want to know something amazing? You can find out! You can click that link up in the summary, read the full text of the decision, and find out! Isn't technology amazing?
For what it's worth, the judge ruled that because Sony had not actually removed the functionality- what they had done instead was ban unmodified PS3s from accessing their service- what they were doing was legal. You may not agree with the decision, at least try to get a grasp on the logic behind it before you start yelling.
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.