Comment Re:Server 2012 already looks like Windows 8. (Score 1) 322
Unfortunately, I think Server 2012 R2 is a paid upgrade unlike the client edition (Win8.1). And Exchange 2010 is not officially supported yet on R2.
Unfortunately, I think Server 2012 R2 is a paid upgrade unlike the client edition (Win8.1). And Exchange 2010 is not officially supported yet on R2.
I dug this out: https://mail.mozilla.org/piper...
What is funny is that the Morris worm came out in late 1988, when MS was beginning development on "NT OS/2". Yes, I am talking about the decision to use a flat instead of segmented address space.
Didn't know this. Looks like it is pretty limited though, as ACPI is much more complex than APM.
I think UEFI is the best solution for things like this and many firmware update utilities already uses it for example.
I don't think APM works on most modern machines though. There is the DOS idle utilities which execute the HLT instruction which is not much but is better than nothing.
Well, it is relatively cheap to do things like this during development of a new major version but relatively expensive to do a security update or hotfix, so they need proof there is actually an exploitable bug, though they will often review surrounding code and do additional fixes when developing security updates.
Remember the "Outlook Email Security Update" from mid-2000 with the pop-ups asking to approve programs sending mail or gathering data from your address book and why it was so difficult to disable?
Screenshot of the Visual Effects dialog: http://i.imgur.com/fNQJjxX.png
Yea, read the end of https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/... and weep. And as it happens Google recently fired Vic Gundotra.
I like to mention this: http://arstechnica.com/civis/v...
At MS?
Eventually Norton AV began to take less resources and I think became easier to uninstall, but I am not sure about the detection rate.
If all else fails, lower your standards.