Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Who gives a shit? (Score 1) 593

There is a lot of peer pressure in school, and this drives people into classes they wouldn't necessarily choose otherwise... School is actually a pretty poor environment for learning anything because of this, kids who work hard get shunned by their peers, smart kids get shunned by their peers, kids who dare to choose a subject thats not seen as appropriate for their gender get shunned.

That's a problem only for certain cultures and why peer group is so important during childhood.

Comment Re:Well... (Score 2) 80

... the rich and powerful elite behind todays governments and therefore also the secret services will learn hopefully soon enough, that their wealth and power is worth nothing, absolutely nothing if you face a large turnaround in society regarding civil rights and privacy rights. Good luck.

You seem to be under the impression the same laws apply to the rich elites as apply to the working class.

Comment Warrant canary for packages (Score 1) 207

A solution to this was invented centuries ago. Seal the packages of network hardware with tamper-proof seals (something involving smart cards that the NSA can't duplicate) from the manufacture. Make it impossible for the NSA to open the package without making the customer aware the package was opened in transit. If a package was opened in transit, return to sender and Cisco engineers can figure out how the NSA is implanting bugs.

Comment Re:Fishy (Score 1) 566

How would a NSL oblige you to make changes to software?

Step 1: NSA goes to judge who is both friendly to them and completely ignorant of technology
Step 2: Request warrant for all truecrypt containers everywhere
Step 3: Tell Truecrypt developers that if they don't insert a backdoor then they're interfering with the warrant, they can't challenge it without revealing who they are

Comment Re: Fishy (Score 1) 566

If you had used JerrysSSLMadeInMyBasementAsACollegeProject, and it was found vulnerable, and you leaked personal information, a court would likely find you negligent. Of consideration would be an analysis of the product on the face: if it looks like a Geocities site done in FrontPage and says "I made this SSL implementation as a college project", you are negligent. If it boasts tons of security research and explanations on why this is much more secure and reliable and resistant to attack and programming bugs than other SSL libraries, you could be found not-negligent.

>

I wonder what the liability issues are for using an antivirus package made by a company founded by a man best known for sneaking into the US using a series of elaborate disguises to avoid prosecution for the murder of his neighbor and then making a video about how to remove said software in which he reveals some of his more colorful vices.

Comment What if... (Score 1) 566

For an even stranger theory, what if the NSA made TrueCrypt under COMSEC and now that SIGINT has been prioritized over COMSEC the people who made it decided that terminating and discrediting the project would be more effective than inserting a back door in the middle of an audit?

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...