Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Same rules apply (Score 1) 303

Similarly IF THE WEBSITE advertises $1000, but when you got to checkout, your total shows $100. The customer should expect the store won't honor the $100 price; if their online shopping cart disagrees with the advertised price.

Could you please explain why the customer should expect the store to not honor the $100 price? Because I would probably look at it and think "huh, I guess it was one of those 'add to cart to see the real price" items."

Comment Re:There must be a very good reason... (Score 1) 579

Firefighters putting out a fire may need to cut into walls or the roof in order to put out a fire. Since there are potentially energized wires in the walls and in the roof, a hazard exists for firefighters. Normally you can turn off the power to a house by removing the electrical meter (at least here in the US anyway), which emergency personnel may do if they are concerned about cutting into energized wires.

I figured that, whether power came in from a solar panel or the grid, the danger of energized wires would exist regardless. Did not realize they would be able to disconnect the burning house from the grid. Though I wonder what they'd do if the meter is inside the house.

Comment Re:Not money, precedent. (Score 1) 1010

Agreed. Many years ago, when I was at the DMV waiting around for my number to be called, I plugged my laptop in to one of the outlets around the walls. A short time later, a cop came up and told me I couldn't do that. I said "oh, sorry", and unplugged my laptop.

That is how this story should have gone down.

Comment Re:Just great... (Score 1) 102

Er... you know that Segway was actually a spin-off technology from the iBot, which was basically a Segway wheelchair with a second pair of wheels it could use in places that were too unstable for Segway-like operation (read: sand at a beach), when the user wanted to lower the chair down to normal seating height (to sit at a table/desk or converse), or even to climb stairs.

Actually, I was not aware of that. Thank you for informing me about it.

Comment Re:Just great... (Score 1) 102

If I have misread your post, I just want to apologize up-front about it.
---
You know, I really hate lmgtfy. It implies that there are such things as stupid questions, which is something that I try to not believe in. And why should anyone ask anything of anyone else, when non-judgmental google is just a mouse-click away? It's not like someone might want to contribute to a semi-realtime conversation with other actual humans, right?

I was genuinely curious what kinds of disabilities a segway would help with. I mean, if you can stand and lean, that implies that you can walk, does it not? And if you can walk, what do you need a seqway for? What part of your disability is it compensating for at that point?

Now? I don't know. But the attitude that I read in your post? I wouldn't be surprised if those kinds of attitudes are part of the reason some people "go ape shit over someone who has an actual disability".

Comment Re:I do this (Score 1) 365

Did I do a good job pointing out what a terrible, terrible idea that is? Or do I need to go with something more ridiculous?

I think you need to go with something less ridiculous, not more. You need to look at the reason clarkkent09 does not want such a law, which is it would preemptively punish innocent people for harm they might potentially cause to someone in the future. Public masturbation and carrying around a shoulder-fired grenade launcher in public I suspect are both currently illegal by themselves, and I don't see why adding "while operating a motor vehicle" would change that. So lets try something that, by itself, is not illegal. The consumption of alcohol.

If I can prove by experiment that can drive more safely while completely plastered than most people with their attention fully focused on the road will I be exempt from these kinds of laws that preemptively punish innocent people for harm they might potentially cause to someone in the future?

Comment Re:Debate over (Score 1) 520

She would not know, she did not make it.

Why does she need to have made the dish in order to know what is in it? She just needs to know who to ask. And in my experience, regarding peanut allergies and cherry allergies, if they don't know off the top of their head, they've always known who to ask.

Comment Re:Debate over (Score 1) 520

You could always try asking the waiter/waitress if you are concerned about what is in your food.

But I agree that the whole "not really zero, it's just low enough that we're allowed to call it zero" thing is bullshit.

Comment Re:Orson Scott Card (Score 1) 732

I don't like spinach. However, I have no problem with other people liking spinach.

Another person doesn't like spinach, and wants to remove spinach from the planet, such that no one can eat it, not even those that do like spinach.

Not all things deserve tolerance. And me not tolerating that other person's feelings does not make me "just as big of a douchbag".

Comment Re:Orson Scott Card (Score 1) 732

whether a person sees the movie or not doesn't effect his bottom line.

It could.

"Wow, look at how well Ender's Game did! We should get the rights for more of this guy's books!"

"Wow, look at what a flop Ender's Game was. Guess we won't be doing any more with this guy's books."

Slashdot Top Deals

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...