Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Obligatory answer: (Score 1) 116

You can't vertically-align objects without scripting.
Yes you can.

You can't define a horizontal-scrolling element without scripting.
I don't even know what you mean. Do you mean like a carousel? You can, but clunky.

You can't define a non-scripted grid-like layout with proportional, fixed and content-dependant sizes mixed together
Sure you can.

It lacks a simple, integrated, templating and data-binding system
So people build their own, mustache, handlebars, ember.js etc

Comment Re:Chrome? (Score 2) 223

so concerned about privacy = doesn't care about keeping up to date with web technology?

"You whippersnappers with your javascript and your canvas! HTML 4.1 was fine for me, and we didn't use javascript back in my day! It was considered bad practice even!"

Comment Re:What's new? (Score 1) 117

Nope, I don't think these will be the guys to do it. I just think the engineer mindset is too prevalent in the open source world (for good reason of course). We need more designers, UX people and others who are not blinded by the technology involved, to pull it all together into a seamless experience, one where the terminal is relegated to the last resort for the normal users (I'd still be using it every day), it shouldn't be something they have to learn to effectively manage their pc these days.

Ubuntu have been trying, but they suffer the same problem of "it's good enough, all the features are accessible". Look at the software centre, it's a piece of shit. It's not a nice experience to browse and install software through, and as much as that might just sound like fluff to some, it's fucking important to get it right, not just transfer what you can do in the terminal to a gui.

Comment Re:What's new? (Score 1) 117

This type of thinking is why mass adoption will never happen on the desktop. You are entirely correct of course, but the OS will continue to be a niche for people who know how to properly use a computer when you only think about things in their technical terms. The same reason the UX and design of open source software has always lagged behind property counter parts, because of thoughts like "If the option is available, then anything else to make it nicer is just wasted cycles, bloat or fluff"

For proper adoption it needs to just work, it's needs to be easy to market and it needs to make sense to joe public. I could sell this to my none geeky friends and family much easier then I could sell ubuntu +pantheon window manager. "Oh it's easy, see you just open the terminal, why yes it does look like what hackers use in movies, now you type sudo apt-get install pantheon... What's that mean? Well, the sudo bit gives you temporary admin access letting you make changes to the system, apt-get is a program that lets you download other programs, install is the command for apt-get and pantheon is the window manager we want to install... well the window manager is what the OS uses to give you windows, it manages how.. *looks up and sees a blank face looking back with glazed eyes* you know what, nevermind. Ok, log out and then select which window manager you want to use, yes there are a variety to choose from, why? well, because "choice is good"... oh, you think that's confusing? Well I guess it could be... blah blah blah

Compare that to "Check out something called Elementary OS. You might like it compared to windows"

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...