"You morons are batting 0.0000"
Almost every one has been within error bars. Who ever is telling you otherwise is a liar.

What kind of idiot doesn't know there are difference species of birds, with different population and think cats bringing down sparrows is the same as a Solar plant taking down raptors?

"I'll pass on the latest climate change panic..."
Oh, that kind of idiot.

But we don't want to, because that waste is actually fuel; which we should be using.

No it isn't.

But they don't kill a lot of raptors. A billion sparrows when there are 100 billion sparrows has less of an impact.

And they may use similar techniques. It's is why their are assessing. Getting more data, get more accurate picture, determine it its' actually a problem, solve the problem.

So your logic is:
These thing over here kill birds; therefore it doesn't matter that this other thing kills birds.

The article says they are heating water; which is odd. I thought most CSPs heated up salt or metal that is pumping into a boiler of water. This allows for 24/7 operation.

Noting there indicate a nuclear shill.

1 every 2 minutes, not about 3 a day.

70+ million hits a month is an extreme minority?

He is the Karate of Comedy.

And you can't use the average temperature as a primary guide. The landing area temperature range from minus 127 C to positive 40 C

The reference for the wheel design is the specifications to meet it's goals.

So, by an actual good measure, the wheel design is a good one. How can something that exceeded it's goals be considered flimsy?

If you bought 50,000 mile tires for you car, and they lasted 75,000 miles would you call them flimsy?

/. stripped the minus sign. 'minus 127' to 'positive 40' C

The temperatures at the landing site can vary from 127 to 40 C. So if you look at the spec you linked, it's outside the range.

It's almost like the engineers are aware of this sort of thing when they designed it..