Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This is why I'm leaving academia. (Score 1) 541

"Science should be determined by the evidence available and the best interpretation of it at the time, not by people's feelings or politics."

I'm not sure that you're not the troll -- I seriously don't understand the level of bellyaching on your part. Who am I going to trust more on the issue, some writer trying to peddle a pop-culture book, or 100+ scientists engaged in the actual research? It's seems like a no-brainer as to who likely has a better grasp of the evidence and interpretation. If you're so intensely bothered by people engaging in argument, then I agree you need to grow a thicker skin or GTFO of academia, if you're actually going in that direction.

Side question: What's your stance on global warming?

Comment Re:Heck, we probably already fund them (Score 1) 125

None of these count as either citations, or even support your original statements. (a) A citation is a short on-topic quote with reference on where to find it -- it is not the entirety of a book, video, or article. (b) All of these sources actually say that Israelis are to blame, except that some Israeli military spokesperson makes a claim that "maybe" Hamas is to blame. I don't see anything here about your GP claim that "You mean the hospital where snipers were shooting at soldiers? Bet you also turn a blind eye to them transporting terrorists around in ambulances.", it's completely off-topic.

Congratulations, I am now even more convinced that you are a BS propagandist. Try again if you like.

Comment Re:Where are the buggy whip dealers? (Score 1) 544

"Way below the margin of error."

False. Sample size and margin of error aren't even commensurable quantities (not even same units). The only requirements for estimating a population proportion are (a) a random sample, and (b) at least 5 "yes" and 5 "no" responses in the sample. As someone else pointed out, the margin of error here would be about 14%, at the 95% confidence level, assuming a randomized sample. (Weiss, Introductory Statistics, 9E, Section 12.1.)

Ladies and gentlemen: The parent post is what it looks like when someone tries to BS you with fancy words that they don't understand.

Comment Re:But what IS the point they're making? (Score 1) 342

"A lot of this hysterical screaming about how we're destroying the planet seems a lot like hubris. On certain level, the idea that we have that much power pleases the egos of some people."

Holy god, these "argument by hubris and ego" debates are so fucking stupid. Look, they can always be flipped around the other way: "People believing they can exponentially expand in population without suffering the same limits as any other species sounds like hubris. The idea that we can do whatever we want without consequences pleases the ego of people."

See? It always cuts both ways, Such a stupid thing to hang an argument on. Scientific data or GTFO.

Comment Re: Not news (Score 1) 342

Guys like him fantasize about living in a sci-fi film so bad (Blade Runner, Foundation series, Martian Chronicles, whatever) that they will the poetically tragic destruction of life on Earth, so long as it better motivates us to become spacemen. The first might happen, the second won't, but they do like to imagine.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...