Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Copyright violation? (Score 1) 230

There are no legal issues with an end user altering the presentation of what they receive to suit their needs. It's not like you're under contract to download all of the cross-site scripts today's hipster web developers burden their creations with. Injecting some Greasemonkey Javascript or blocking malicious code can be interpreted as a derivative work but there is no further distribution to other parties to make the case of damages through copyright infringement. This is commonly done with screen readers and other non-traditional browsers that need to simplify the content. Having a middle man do that without consent by either sender or receiver is another thing entirely.

Comment Re:DJ (Score 1) 137

Disney isn't in the dance club DJ business so despite the similarity in trademarks there is no direct competition between them that could cause market confusion. Deadmau5 doesn't get airtime on mainstream radio so Radio Disney doesn't count either.

Comment Re:+ operator for string concat? (Score 1) 729

I would say it's more of a quirk in both Java and Javascript because they eschew operator overloading in the name of some notion of academic purity and then they go and implement special semantics for the '+' operator that you can't replicate with a user defined type. Same with C++'s abuse of literal 0 before the advent of nullptr.

Comment Where are the interlocks? (Score 5, Interesting) 143

This is pretty bad. I designed a controller for some mechanical actuators on a satellite once and the design was filled with carefully designed interlocks and watchdog logic that would prevent an unintentional deployment in the event of multiple failures. It's astonishing that this could get installed on the ISS without a similarly rigorous design.

Comment Re:Easiest "Fix" (Score 1) 448

That equipment was all sold as part of the massive jobs program that the MIC has turned into. Nobody wants to make credible deep cuts in military spending because of the massive unemployment it would generate (and Representatives of affected districts would loose in their next election) so we look for markets to ply with our war materiel. It works out great if you can create new markets for these goods.

Losing control of some weapons to the current enemy of the day only ensures a need for more production to counteract the threat they represent. That's good for business. This is the mindset of the American oligarchs who run the country and pull the strings on their elected puppets. You can almost view our dalliances in the Middle East as a way to guarantee a future revenue steam by purposely inciting instability.

Slashdot Top Deals

Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek

Working...