It only preserves their ads when they're coming from the same server or domain . . . of course, there would then be an arms race between the ad companies and blockers for obfuscation, a la 1980s copy protection . . .
hawk
"News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters"
Some of what they post falls under the latter category, not the former.
Could it be that this article annoyed you *because* you're an electrical engineer?
Doesn't matter I was happy to see his article this morning.
Protip: If someone has to give them to you, they aren't rights; they're privileges.
Inherently illegal isn't really a thing. Maybe you mean immoral?
No, I mean illegal. The US Constitution recognizes that there are things beyond the reach of any government's authority and by their very nature, such things cannot emanate from the government. Ergo, violation of such rights is inherently illegal regardless of what laws or judges or kings and queens might say or do.
In any case, courts in the US have been just fine with authorizing the killing of schoolchildren. None of the involved parties fried for it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Regardless of the unfortunate case you cited and the suspicions that a grave injustice was done, capital punishment is not murder by its very definition. To clarify my example, the Supreme Court cannot order or authorize me to go out and kill random schoolchildren. They can order or authorize the capture and punishment of a person convicted of a capital crime, but they lack the requisite authority to allow or require that I go kill innocent people.
There are things the state cannot grant or authorize because they would violate the rights of the people. The US Constitution recognizes some of that (at least on paper; in practice...). The government lacks the requisite authority to authorize those rights to be denied or revoked.
When they do it anyway, all involved should be hauled off to prison, even if it takes an army of the people to do so.
It looks like they are trying to say that, in order to bulk collect data, they must have a specific search they are running that involves a specific telephone line. See SEC 201.
Can someone define "tangible things" as in "SEC. 103. Prohibition on bulk collection of tangible things" or "“(i) Emergency authority for production of tangible things."
Well I'm sure the Executive branch can define it for you, though you may find the particulars of their definition convoluted and self-serving.
No court can authorize an inherently illegal action. The Supreme Court of the United States can approve me murdering schoolchildren all it wants, but my ass will still fry for it (and rightfully so).
I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice. If you want legal advice from me, pay my retainer. If you get your legal advice from slashdot, you deserver whatever happens . . .
Anyway, I've read much of the below. If you are in this situation, and it's not worth paying a lawyer who practices in this area, what you're doing isn't that important.
I don't work in IP at the moment, but there is enough misinformation below to keep several lawyers busy.
There is a reason for hiring a professional programmer instead of doing it yourself. Similarly, there is a reason to hire an actual lawyer rather than misinformation of the internet . . .
hawk, esq.
This is just like the old days where everyone (except the rich) in Russia got inferior quality (and quantity) stuff to avoid the evil western companies run by their evil capitalist masters. Now mind you, the moment the government stopped enforcing that restriction, it was as though floodgates had opened, but I'm sure this new era of restrictions will enjoy some popularity for a little while. Once that's over, few will have the guts to complain openly.
1) What's the difference? Do you anticipate that these companies will go out and mow lawns to make up for what the tax is costing? Any costs of doing business tacked on by the government get passed on to the customers; that's the way it works.
They always need just a little bit more, don't they.
What needs to happen first is for major software vendors to begin supporting it. That's when you'll see enterprises at least begin to consider it.
MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE!
You mean more than the cluelessness to which I responded, or that you have shown?
Nah. I'm a libertarian. I don't try to force feed people.
Oooh, same old nonsense to trot out. Haven't had a new thought in a while have you?
Was there anything like the 1787 constitution before the US created it?
Was there anything like the Wright Brothers flyer before they created it?
Everything is new at some point.
And Ayn Rand
Go, find someone else's leg to pull, and I can guarantee it won't be a libertarian's if that's the best argument you got.
Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.
