Comment Apple Newton 2100 (Score 1) 635
Also, Olympus E-1 pro digital camera (just 5 megapixels, but weather sealed and with 160,000 shutter actuations and counting).
Oh, and printing stuff.
Also, Olympus E-1 pro digital camera (just 5 megapixels, but weather sealed and with 160,000 shutter actuations and counting).
Oh, and printing stuff.
Better than, say, the health care systems in the UK, Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Taiwan, etc.?
there are a lot of shitty developing countries with healthcare that's much worse, and there's the united states.
There are a good number with better healthcare than Canada no question, but the number of countries with much worse or none eclipses that list
There's "the alternatives" and there's "the alternatives worth considering". The latter category excludes the developing countries in question, as well as the US. Hopefully the people in charge of health care in Canadian governments (federal and provincial) are looking at the alternatives in the latter category to see what they can learn from them.
Perhaps you're referring to some news of which I'm not aware.
No. That's correct. You can't add registers, keep the same functionality, and add all the circuitry to suport said functionality by reducing functionality and taking away regsiters. Who would have thought?
That isn't answering the question I asked.
The question I asked was "You can't trade off, say, transistors used for registers (especially given that the bigger processors do register renaming, so you have more hardware registers than the actual RISC/CISC instruction set provides) for transistors used for some other purpose?"
I said nothing about keeping all the same functionality, if by "functionality" you mean, for example, "on-chip caches of the same size" and "same number of hardware registers including ones used for renaming of the architected registers" or "complexity of the branch prediction hardware" or
Perhaps you should give it 3 secs investigation before you shout off.
3 secs should be just enough to click the "more information" link.
it is ridiculous to sell a game using Mac software and then it will not run
Doesn't the Steam page for each game explicitly list which operating systems it is compatible with in the information box with all of the other info?
It seems that in his case the store page incorrectly claimed that the software has also a Mac version, but when he purchased it, he found that it's Windows-only.
The store page for AVGN Adventures seems to show correct information right now: only a flag symbol showing that it's Windows software. Maybe previously that page had both a flag and an apple symbol? That's how I interpret the situation.
Seriously who gives a flying fuck. What does it really matter? Are you so far up the communists' asshole that you think everything on this planet is going to be completely 100% representative of the population of the planet?
It has significantly reduced my ability to customize the user interface of Firefox to suit my needs.
Again, hand waving without specifics. The most noticeable change for me was that they button to customise the UI is now on the toolbar by default, rather than hidden away somewhere. What can you no longer customise that you could previously?
The problem is that it's a dumbed-down UI design
I really don't understand this complaint. The UI changes were relatively small, and one of the biggest ones was making the 'customize UI' button more prominent in the new versions.
I switched to Firefox on Android recently because Chrome for Android has the same handicapped cookie management policy as the older Android Browser, but Firefox lets me run the self-destructing cookies plugin, which does exactly what I've wished for the last 15 years all browsers would do by default.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?