Unless it is big enough to deflect the planet it is orbiting (Pluto/Chiron), the mass of the satellite does not matter. All that matter is the particulars of its orbit.

Changing to first to file doesn't change the fact that only the inventor can file a patent. If you could show in court that your work was used to file the patent, you would win it back. Note that this is different from the case where someone else independently invents the same thing and files first.

Section 8 - Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the ...

That seems to cover this

Or, "I could care less" means I care so little, I could care less about this than anything else I'm supposed to care about.

How do you achieve negative revenues (as opposed to profit, where negative values make sense)?

If that were true, why did he repeat said campaign promise post-inauguration?

All the articles I have read indicate that both Suggested Sites and the Bing Toolbar were enabled, not that the search term was being entered into it. Where are you getting that the search term was entered into the Bing Toolbar itself?

You are correct in your facts, but I disagree with your interpretations. The problem I have is not that MS got information on a link clicked, but that the got information on the related search term as well. This means MS was either capturing screen input or parsing the google url to extract the search term. Either way, google is arguing that Bing is using novel information created by google's well crafted (or in the case of the honeypot, intentionally malcrafted) algorithms, even if that information is filtered through users first.

Oceans are bigger. So big, that there are only 3-5 of them: Arctic?, Atlantic, Indian, Pacific, Southern?? The smallest (the Arctic) is neary 5 times the size of the largest sea, which is similar in size to other large seas.

Would you rather see the value of your money drop because your government (which you have some small say in the operation of) decided it was for the best, or because some random person in Africa found a gigantic super rich seam of gold?

I always thought the fun failed because it was easier to tell a computer how give you the correct answer than to solve it yourself.

Just because guns a legal doesn't mean Toys 'R Us has to sell them. If Toys 'R Us was the only store in the country however...

That's because it is not a "reality show"; it is a documentary.

But that is how the SCOTUS works. It rules on a CASE where there is confusion as to what the constitution and law say. When it rules that the constitution overrides the law, it technically only rules for that case. However, to keep the SCOTUS from being bothered repeatedly by the same issue, lower courts take that one case as a precedent for similar cases. The law is not "struck down" or removed, it is simply ignored by the courts as being overridden by the constitution. Creating firm rulings where the law is ambiguous or contradictory seems like "judicial Power" to me. Perhaps "judicial Power" meant something else in Jefferson's time?

Fixed