Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Addicted. (Score 2, Interesting) 234

Quite. Here in the UK the convention is that no Parliament may be bound by its predecessors, with the actual effect that we can change our "constitution" with a simple majority vote in the Commons. Considering the power of the party whips, and the tendency to one-party rule, we do effectively have an elected dictator.

Less so this time round, with the coalition, but even they have shown they can change the constitution with a simple majority vote and are willing to do so without an explicit mandate.

Comment Re:Much more primitive than we expect (Score 1) 648

It's all very well for you to get preachy sitting in a safe western home*. I should imagine the people living in poverty in Asia, Africa, and some parts of South America and Europe would all much rather we put our resources towards giving them a reasonable existence than this my-rocket-car-is-bigger-than-your-rocket-car nonsense.

*Ok, this is an assumption, but you're on Slashdot so it seems a fairly reasonable one.

Comment Re:From what I've heard, it really is that bad... (Score 1) 673

Of course, it's also pretty clear that Branson is angling for a handout here, not really deeply interested in science or public policy. He has a pretty big self-interest in convincing people that the cause of the shutdown was government overreaction, in which case the government should compensate the airlines; rather than having people believe that the shutdown was a necessary reaction to the volcanic eruption.

It is an interesting point though. European regulations, intended to stop airlines leaving passengers in the lurch because they over-booked a flight, have made airlines the insurers of last resort for people stranded due to natural disaster. The airlines have incurred a lot of costs, not just on lost business but also on having to pay for accommodation and food for their passengers while they've been stranded. They're also liable for reasonable alternative means of transport. There's a nice summary on the BBC.

While this is nice for passengers, the airlines themselves have no-one to lean on. As this is an act of God, the insurance won't pay out. The government closed the airspace, and is the normal insurer of last resort for natural disasters (see Chile, Haiti etc.). While the summary rags on "greedy airlines", this is not the fault of an airline having mis-judged its margins but an unprecedented restriction on normal business. I think that there is a good case, in moral terms, for at least having the EU refund the costs brought on by passenger rights legislation.

I'm not crticising the government for closing the airspace either, to clarify, I have nowhere near enough knowledge on volcanos or jet engines to form an opinion. I just think that we should note that the airlines have been forced into an uncomfortable, and I think unjust, position.

Comment Re:"very good messaging phones"... (Score 1) 278

A lot of people are complaining about SMS being expensive. I suspect this poster is in the UK or EU, but here in the UK an unlimited SMS plan costs the same as a data plan on most carriers and contracts (3 being the possible exception).

A data plan is only useful really if you have a smartphone. 1GB of WAP browsing? Thanks but not thanks. People here are still more likely to have a large or unlimited text allowance than a data plan, though that probably won't continue for much longer with the explosion of smartphones.

Slashdot Top Deals

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...