The flap over VLC was because another developer ported the code and put it in the app store.
Well, it's not that simple. By the terms of the GPL, anyone has the right to port the code, even if the original developers object. The issue was that distributing an application with DRM, even if for free, puts you outside the GPL, and thus at the mercy of any of the copyright holders to charge you with copyright infringement. In this case, there was one core VLC developer (and Nokia employee, lol) who really wanted VLC pulled from the App Store, and neither Apple nor the other developers felt like going to court over it, so they had to pull the app.
By trying to now establish a VP8 patent pool they are telling the world at large that WebM is just as good as what they have.
Non sequitur. Google's campaign is not based on VP8 being as good as H264, but on it being "patent-free". MPEG-LA is just telling the world that the choice is not between a better, but patent-encumbered codec and a worse, but patent-free one; it is between a better codec with a known licensing model, and a worse one whose patent status is simply unknown - and they're looking into it.
An HTTP redirect is typically resolved in less than a second. If your download is going to take over a minute, that's less that 1% of your total download time.
But if you're using Akamai to serve web page content, one second is a huge delay. Adding one second to the download of a CSS stylesheet is likely to have a bigger impact on browsing speed than all of the JavaScript improvements browser makers have been boring us with this year.
"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne