Comment Re:Value-Added Teacher Analysis (Score 1) 511
It would be much cheaper and more effective to find better ways of evaluating teachers,
It is impossible to have only rock-star teachers. Most will be middle of the road, as in every industry anywhere. If you went through every industry and fired everyone who was not a rock-star performer the vast majority of the public would be out of a job. Sorry to rain on your parade but you have to accept that the vast majority of everyone working out there is merely adequate. And that includes teachers. This rule also applies to doctors. Isn't that comforting?
You also don't seem to understand that the biggest determining factor in a child's success in school is actually not the teacher. It's the parents. Don't take my word for it, google the subject and research it for yourself.
Throwing technology into schools does not change anything. Reading, writing and math still work the same way they have always worked. Now you throw tech into the classroom and the teacher has to take valuable instruction time to make sure each child's computer is setup correctly and they they all know how to use it. What happens if one of those laptop's doesn't work? More instruction time is lost.
You want to really change education? How about year-round school? How about paying teachers more? If you pay more you'll attract more teachers. Yes most of them will still just be adequate, but you might also lure more rock-star teachers into the education if they don't have to give up more than half their earning power to do it. If that were to happen, things would only improve slightly, if at all. In the end if the parents don't value education, neither will the kids.