Comment Re:Asimov. Strips. (Score 1) 357
Which answers the question: what could possibly go wrong?
Which answers the question: what could possibly go wrong?
The currently #13 petition is to end software patents. Sign it now!
Somatically, I'd prefer 36 hours, but, not being a hermit, I need to sync with weekly events.
Nope. This is what a trillion dollars looks like: $1000000000000.00
This kind of money only exists in financial institution computers, it never gets moved around on pallets. The most that was ever moved around that way was the billion or so that got "misplaced" in Iraq.
RFMD has licensed some NREL 3-junction technology, and is in the midst of the approx. 3-year project to take it from "we made one in the lab" to "we're mass-producing them in our foundry". I think they're going to rock the market in one to two years. http://www.semiconductor-today.com/news_items/2011/MAR/RFMD_030311.html
"All forward-looking statements are present expectations of future events and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements."
Unix is a trademark owned by the The Open Group, and you may use that trademark to describe your system if you pay money to have them run their tests to verify compliance with the Single Unix Specification. I believe Red Hat has done that in the past, and that particular version of Linux was thus bona fide Unix(R), but it seems Red Hat has not chosen to continue certifying their systems. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
I believe Red Hat sent back upstream all the changes they needed to make to pass the test; I presume many others also worked on conformance to the standard. Sometimes those behaviors aren't there unless the POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable is set.
Thus, while not "legally" Unix, Linux normally does realize all the concepts and behaviors of real Unix.
this store is now a cell-phone free environment."
There. If I predict it, it will be less likely.
'Back in 1970, a young physicist working in the Soviet Union made a counterintutive prediction. Vitaly Efimov, now at the University of Washington in the US, showed that quantum objects that cannot form into pairs could nevertheless form into triplets.
In 2006, a group in Austria found the first example of such a so-called Efimov state in a cold gas of cesium atoms. [...]
Today, Nils Baas at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology makes another startling prediction. He says that the strange, unworldly bonds that allow cesium atoms to stick together in triplets should allow much more complex objects to form too. In fact, he says we're on the verge of discovering a brand new form of matter governed by an entirely new branch of physics.'
Looking at the pictures in the article and trying to imagine how they work in multiple dimensions only makes my brain hurt a little bit. Here is the arxiv paper the article references.
The original article was concerned with expected longevity for mature adults. General "life expectancy", such as being cited in these comments, includes life expectancies for children and young adults as well as mature adults. Assuming both the original article and these general life expectancy figures are correct, one must conclude it is more dangerous to be a child or young adult in the U.S.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer