I doubt that it will fly up here in Canada. First, we pay a tax on all recordable media, so there is no such thing as piracy in Canada - unless you are downloading more than just music. Second, this is regulated by the CRTC, not the government. Third, someone tried this approach in the past and the court of appeals threw it out. So good luck to you MPAA.

Then you need to be far more attentive and dilligent at what you do.
Get off your ass, turn off the Simpsons, and do the job you get paid to do.
If you aren't willing to do the job you have, there are many others that will - and probably without the poor me whiny attitude.

That's funny and wrong I don't know where to begin...

Yes,here is an example of it gone wrong.
http://canadianhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/science_of_eugenics_abused

Unfortunately this could also lead to compulsory sterilization for certain classes of people and risk groups(which has been tried before and failed miserably). Which is not only unethical, but it removes peoples right to choose their own lives destiny. How many people will wind up with this stigma because it won't work the way they hope it will.

There is no amount of accumulated data that will tell them which people are capable and willing to change their behavior so that they can be an integral part of society.

There isn't really a whole lot in the article about this. It would be nice if they told us how this could help, or how they hope it might help.

Can they identify these tumors with a simple blood test now or do they still have to do an invasive biopsy?

You guys do realize that there was a fellow named Tesla that did some really ground breaking work on this originally, right?

Finally, a translation app that just might be effective.

By the logic that it's not up to me to inspect a car purchase, that would be the dealership responsible for the fact of selling me an intact auto that is not made up of parts from a chop shop.

I'm not saying that it didn't cost them anything, look at all the egg on the face. It did indeed cost them something. But they would have looked a lot better had they caught it on their own, and then pulled the site down. Getting caught, that's never good. Aren't you supposed to audit projects like that to make certain that this type of thing doesn't happen?

I just don't think that volunteering to take your hand out of the cookie jar when someone catches you qualifies as doing anything to further the position they are in. It's just not the same as taking steps to assure us that this type of thing won't happen again.

I have to agree on the point that MS definetely needs to step up their level of due diligence. Then I also ask myself why you would do business with a company that has a history of this behaviour. Doesn't anyone track and record what these sub-contractors do?(or is that like tracking a shoddy plumber?) Then MS did seem to get caught with the cookie jar again. When I was a child there were penalties for breaking rules. Come to think of it, there still are, unless you're a giant corporation it seems.

I'm sure the industry has probably made sizable contributions on the political front, exactly for this reason. Judging from the business practices in the past it sure won't stop anytime soon. It makes 'Payola' seem somewhat harmless. Of course that's just my $ 0.02.

Just imagine the other inmates, 'So, what are you in for?'