Why would she burn nostalgic entertainment from her youth?

If a public bench have a fleshlight attached, would you put your dick into it?
No?
Well, then don't put your USB into the digital equivalent.

If I need 100GW of coal power at 5% of capacity, can I build only 5% of the coal plants? Will the coal plants have only 5% the running cost?
This is the problem of intermittent power sources, they end up requiring almost the same amount of conventional backup energy sources as if they didn't exist in the first place, so from an economic point of view they're a terrible choice because they're by no means cheap either.

Running a coal plant at loss doesn't happen when it's a private actor behind it. Either the energy from coal is more expensive to cover for less uptime, or they shut it down and move. I know Germany tries to put itself into a position as saviour of the world and to prove that green energy is best energy but reality doesn't agree.

Sure, lets build a grid capable of handling 10000 times more than the local demand will ever amount to because we're piping electricity from all europe to china through it.

Or we could take the money that would cost and use it to produce any other form of electricity locally.

Might as well be more concerned about politicians and corporations that deny the lord and saviour Jesus Christ.
He have about as much evidence as mmgw does.

I guess the NRA is a good place to read about debunking of the more guns = more gun death FUD too.
Because clearly biased sources are always right in your world.

Doesn't work very well:
http://www.spiegel.de/internat...
In short, the aluminium plants can't work on unstable grid power.

You're not going to die from radiation sickness unless you try. In any disaster not being global thermonuclear war you're going to be able to walk away from the radioactive materials.

I think The Obscene will capture the spirit better.

Pay homeless people $100 to point lasers at airplanes while recording them.

Don't worry, when you realize the prerequisites for it you'll also realize that less than 1% of the population will be able to do it.

It works for other mammals, humans just require some technical details sorted out and good protocols made. Regarding possible injuries from the cooling: It doesn't really matter, if it saves lives, it saves lives.

Good luck convincing 7 billion people to adjust their daily lives because a contested model say they need to do so today.
Pre-emptive climate intervention is also predicted to be much more expensive than the wait-and-see approach, in addition of potentially having little to no effect long term; cutting emissions 20% still means we emit CO2 and concentrations will increase.

Also, we're not seeing rapid changes in climate. We're seeing atmospheric CO2 increase while the climate itself goes its own model-defying way.

Men don't have cycles, or spotting, and doesn't discharge things quite as often.
They also don't become deficient of certain products in old age which causes them to rapidly change appearance.