If you've rooted your phone you can just remove all the google framework crap.

How? Is there a guide somewhere to what things actually have to be removed?

The answer to a user interface problem is not "the misleading user interface's behavior is described in the manual".

By your reasoning, there's no such thing as a user interface problem at all, as long as the behavior is described in a manual somewhere.

Google Photos is a different application than backup sync. More at 11.

Nonsense. This is a user interface problem. The whole thing is designed such that someone who runs Google Photos would reasonably believe that Google Photos is doing the uploading and that if you get rid of Google Photos, it will not upload.

User interface problems inherently lead to users not knowing how to do things. Replying "it doesn't work that way, and the user should have known that" is just trying to deny the concept of user interface problems--at some point, the fact that the user doesn't know something is the fault of the interface designer, not the user.

It's called a "hatchetman" and is an old trick for business administration. Googling the term produced a lot of dictionary definitions, but not much in the way of in-depth articles. But now that you know what it's called, you can look it up.

"High crime in Republican states" can mean high crime in Democratic-run areas within Republican states.

Fewer women click ads for such jobs for reasons unrelated to the prevalence of such ads. Women are much less inclined to work long hours for more pay in preference to being with their family. $200K jobs are likely to be the type of job which requires prioritizing work over everything else, so women won't click on such ads.

The biggest worry about people judging you because of stupid stuff on the Internet is individual private decisions, such as employers or potential dates looking you up. Public blame is not the same thing as private blame, especially in this case, where the social justice warriors are for once on the right side but their influence is limited to preventing public blame--they can't keep someone from not hiring, or dating, or renting to, a victim.

I'd also expect that the effects of the Fappening are unusually low because it is about celebrities. Nobody's going to refuse to hire Kim Kardashian because someone posted nude pictures of her.

I wouldn't want to work for a company who judged me for the stupid shit I did as a teenager or if I were a homosexual.>/blockquote>

I would like to work for a company who enables me to earn money that I can use to eat and pay rent.

It's easy to say "I wouldn't want to work for a company that wouldn't hire me" if you don't need a job. If you need a job, you would much rather be hired by a company who hates you than not be hired.

If you raise the property tax, the tax will be passed down to the poor people in the form of rent increases.

There's a reason why a business' emails are internal - they're not designed for the world to see, as they discuss internal strategies, planning, projects, research, personal reactions to presentations, HR stuff, and more.

Internal strategy over buying politicians isn't really "internal", or at least shouldn't be. When the politician passes a law because he's bought, no judge will be impressed if you say "that law was an internal Sony matter so I shouldn't go to jail".

If Microsoft charged for patches, they wouldn't be able to force patches on people. Forcing patches lets them do lots of things that benefit themselves and are bad for the consumer, including forcing ads, remotely disabling certain hardware if they have a dispute with the manufacturer, retroactively removing features (See; Sony PS3 Linux), imposing restrictions that consumers didn't agree with, etc.

However, Snowden *could* have informed US citizens of US government secret domestic surveillance activities, without taking *any* classified information outside the US.

Doing that would just get him tried and sentenced in secret.

Then why don't we see a "nude cigarette smokers with lung cancer project"?

beauty can be found in other body types

I thought you said it isn't marketing. Trying to sell the idea that body types which are damaging to health are beautiful is marketing of bad health as good.

That is not true. Paypal's language uses collection calls as an example, but is written in such a way that they can robocall you for any reason or no reason.

As others have pointed out, betting against the housing market is a good thing. It was betting for, not against, the housing market that caused the problem. By betting against it, he incrementally raised the cost to the banks of making bad decisions. This is beneficial to society.