Comment Re:Nuclear is obvious, an energy surplus is desire (Score 1) 433
But most people don't want that nuclear option right?
In the Scrabble universe?
http://www.howstuffworks.com/l...
http://www.scrabblefinder.com/...
p.s. pay more attention to the spelling, the Z is important in scrabble.
that's a pretty good question...humans seem to be the only creatures (that we know of of course) in this simulation that have achieved the level of consciousness of which you speak
But why do you say so? I'm talking about the consciousness _experience_ not the behaviour.
I have no evidence that you experience consciousness anymore than I have evidence that a dog does too. How can you or a dog prove to me that you experience consciousness?
All I know is that I am conscious and I doubt I'm that special, and that's why I have faith that others are conscious too. I don't see such a big difference between humans and many other animals.
From what I gather we don't even know in detail how single celled creatures make decisions! Testate amoebas build distinctive shells for themselves, putting particles in the right places. Some can even decide to not reproduce if there's not enough material for daughter cells to have their own shells. Maybe they experience consciousness too, just limited in their capabilities and senses?
see also: http://gamenaminator.com/
Have you seen any alternatives to moderation/meta-moderation schemes that exclude this?
I haven't seen any implemented but a possible way is to keep the opposing groups apart.
If "A" doesn't like "B" just make it less likely that "A" and "B" end up in the same match (or see each others posts).
If "A" starts getting too picky "A" might end up in fewer matches. If "B" really is an asshole, then "B" might end up in fewer matches too.
I've proposed this before to an MMO and also a related "Points of View" method for reviewing products: http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
After a while you might end up with distinct groups and then you can do some research and datamining on them
If you were really writing CGI apps in C and not using stuff like FastCGI then your apps would likely be slower than a FastCGI or modperl/modphp etc program due to the overheads of process creation.
So yeah it does seem silly to use C, a slow to develop language combined with CGI, a slow way of running webapps. Worse of both worlds.
How many pages per second and concurrent requests could your CGI C apps handle?
Funny. Years ago I thought I remember research that said the reverse. Can't find it though - Google seems crappier nowadays (you just get zillions of hits for the 2014 item).
Even reduce premature births: http://www.dentistrytoday.com/...
Generally periodontal disease seemed linked to higher heart disease: http://www.webmd.com/heart-dis...
So maybe the particular mouthwash used was bad?
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"