Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:the poll on the nbc site ... (Score 1) 1016

I just noticed something a little disturbing about that webpage. Did you notice that under the NBC logo it says "is furious about playstation piracy"

We're not furious at the piracy, we're furious at how the DMCA is being used to throw people in jail for 10 years for modifying other's hardware with permission. He was not arrested for piracy...

Comment Re:A good combination of a storyline and graphics. (Score 1) 506

Perhaps some people have an easier time becoming immersed in a game. I've played a number of games that allowed me to become immersed in them (mostly RPGs, and a few from other genres), and essentially identify myself with the main character.

They don't necessarily need great graphics, or sound for that matter. They need storyline and character development. They need relatively smooth gameplay, with very few and short delays. The control scheme needs to be such that after a while it becomes transparent... almost a reflex. If you have to think about how you need to use the controller to do a specific task even after hours of gameplay, I'd say the developer failed on the controls. Removing external distraction helps in becoming immersed as well.

You should try to feel like a character in a game. It may enhance the experience for you. Yes, we know you is where your consciousness lives, but wouldn't it be nice to let it visit another time and place once in a while? If not, why are you playing the game when you're life is obviously more exciting than it?

Comment Re:About 2 Kilos (Score 1) 495

If you just think of the bits stored in the brain, perhaps you'd overestimate the pure storage of it due to the brains automatic decompression (by the methods listed in parent post) of the data. The link to geocities seems like it may overestimate due to the assumption that all synapse junctions represent 8 bits (256 levels) of *recoverable* data (though they give the possibility of storage at the molecular level). It also does not distinguish parts of the brain that can possibly store data with parts that have more a computational purpose.

Perhaps we should use an estimate by studying how much data with extremely low entropy/redundancy someone can memorize. 83,431 digits of pi were recited by Akira Haraguchi. Each digit is worth essentially 3.3 bits, so that makes it around 275000 bits. Of course, he knows a lot more than just the digits of pi, but that's how much "brain space" he was able to "allocate" to memorizing pi.

Perhaps if we could determine the average number of memories a person can remember and the average bits to store the average memory (compressed, of course), then we could come up with another estimate. Though this would ignore any type of specialized memory.

But really, I have no idea. Of course, if you don't care about recovering data with any type of speed then you could store everything as just an array of atoms or subatomic particles.

As for the doors and doorknobs example, are you sure the toddler never watched you use a door before they got to try it? Learning by imitation (which seems innate) is a powerful thing. I think AI research will keep bootstrapping along, but the development of true AI does seem like a rather impossible goal. How would you program consciousness anyway? Could it ever truly be conscious/sentient? Then again... are we just complex computers? What is our subconscious doing? Perhaps it is more like a machine interpreting code than we think. And perhaps *SEGMENTATION FAULT*

Slashdot Top Deals

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...