What about servers that employ data scrambling? From the sound of it, this should completely defeat the Hammer exploit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M... /scrambling

That would work if the murders were covered up and, upon bringing them to public attention, the criminals were brought to justice.

But alas, the murders _are_ publicly know. It's just that the corrective force is completely failing.

The transparency is here, it's just without consequence.

Yeah, who cares about the murders he is directly responsible for. Let's regret missing transparency.

He is a MURDERER.

You have a fucking murderer with a NOBEL P E A C E PRIZE as a president.

Go fuck yourselves, you fascist pigs!

Oma gehts gut!

You implied your "SSL key signer" has your private key which is not the case as it would be royally stupid.

Yeah, they better teach about these techniques if you really think SSL works by handing out your private keys.

Noone is getting tracking information from me. I don't care if the ads are not personalized then because I don't see them anyway.

Fuck off and get a real job, marketing scum.

Because I don't sugercoat idiocy? You had two chances to state simple and correct facts, yet you chose to claim authority over stuff you know jack shit about, being a pompous idiot in the process and now you're all butthurt?

Get off my lawn, kid. Good riddance.

I have no idea WTF you are talking about. A closed TCP port emits an RST. It even says so in the very link you posted:

http://www.tcpipguide.com/free...

"Receipt of a SYN message on a port where there is no process listening for connections."

Next time you try to be a smart-ass, get your facts straight. Idiot.

No, you should be getting a TCP RST.

Do you kids know anything?

The stupidity lies in answering with an A record at all.

Just say there is no address (NXDOMAIN). No useless traffic, no semantics to worry about.

It's always fun to read these posts by people who have no clue whatsoever about routing.

"But if I use publicly routable addresses, my local traffic goes via my ISP!"

Read a networking book, dummy.

As long as this matter is in its current state, I wouldn't even bother thinking about the minute details of the "suggestions" on the page.

This whole thing is just absurdly smelling like Lavabit.

They're not only not convenient, they're also not secure in the sense that in order to work with your data, you have to decrypt it _somewhere_. Unless you secure erase your free drive space after zipping your files back up and deleting the unencrypted copies, I wouldn't consider that data to be secure anymore, at all.