Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Encountered this kind of thing ... (Score 1) 204

So the first question should be: is there a dead weight person on your team? That is obviously a sensitive question, but it is what this is all about.

In the OP's scenario, the assumption is that each group, no matter how small, contains one such person.

While there are many dubious assumptions in that scenario, this one alone is sufficient to show that the process is statistical nonsense.

HR should not be playing with math that they don't understand.

Comment Re:WTF? (Score 1) 622

Wait a minute! You are implying it's the Journalists fault...

No he's not. He is pointing out that it was regrettably naive of the journalist not to act in a paranoid manner, given that the government has repeatedly demonstrated its disregard for constitutional protections.

Why do we see so many binary, black-or-white responses to just about anything? Is there a significant portion of humanity who cannot consider more than one idea at a time?

Submission + - A Diagnosis for Healthcare.gov

Capt.Albatross writes: At Slate, David Auerbach reports on Thursday's hearing concerning the healthcare.gov debacle. It was "a spectacle of tech illiteracy and buck-passing", he says, which may not elicit much surprise around here. He is particularly scornful of the contractors' obsession with checking off milestones rather than with delivering something that works, their willingness to call something 'done' before having tested it, and their apparent obliviousness to how incompetent this shows them to be.

Comment Re:Faster than the nVidia GTX TITAN for $400 less (Score 1) 157

Irrelevant. The Titan was never meant to be a consumer-level card, it's something that's meant to be sitting between the consumer (sub-700) market and the professional (1000+) cards.

Is that marketing bullshit that I'm smelling?

an artificial restriction to somewhat justify the cost of professional cards.

I don't think 'justify' is quite the right word here...

Comment Re:Wrong question (Score 2) 56

"anatomical differences between cartilage in dinosaurs and mammals may not directly explain why some dinosaurs grew to larger sizes."

Anatomical differences are never going to explain "why", they can only explain "how".

Agreed - this is sloppy reporting (mainly in the /. summary but also in the original). I think what they are trying to say is that this particular joint design, which evolved in smaller reptiles, later proved to be helpful in the evolution of giant dinosaurs - i.e., it was a sort of exaptation (formerly known as pre-adaption) in the sense that while this design's posited suitability for carrying large loads wasn't necessary when it evolved (the mammalian design was equally capable for animals of that size), it became a decider as evolutionary forces favored gigantism.

Comment Re:There are also other ways to do some of this. (Score 1) 79

There is another way to do that, which I believe is much more sensitive: Send the pulse on one frequency, listen for the return on a harmonic.

This is a follow-on to my earlier question, about the difficulty of receiving the harmonics of a radar-frequency interrogation pulse. If the pulse consisted of two distinct frequencies (or was transmitted in addition to a continuous illumination at a different frequency), would a diode or other nonlinear reflector generate a return signal at the beat frequency?

Comment Better URL (Re:compensation) (Score 1) 192

Doh! I should have stripped off the parameters:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/business/26nocera.html [In Prison for Taking a 'Liar Loan' - Joe Nocera - NY Times; may require registration, or try reaching it through a search engine.]

and there is a follow-up:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/02/opinion/nocera-the-mortgage-fraud-fraud.html

Comment Re:compensation (Score 4, Informative) 192

For instance in the mortgage fraud scandal they were allowed to settle fraudulent foreclosures for pennies on the dollar. Why are these companies never required to make the people they hurt whole again?

I don't intend to defend Knight Capital, but there is a big difference between its incompetence and negligence in this case, and the deliberate and fraudulent actions that characterized the mortgage mess. No individual in the financial industry has been held accountable for these actions, even while some of the people they exploited have been prosecuted: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/business/26nocera.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all [In Prison for Taking a 'Liar Loan' - Joe Nocera - NY Times; may require registration, or try reaching it through a search engine.] This, I believe, is the "most scandalous aspects of the financial mess of 2008."

Comment Re:compensation (Score 4, Informative) 192

How about suing? Did those who were hurt sue?

The customers have probably signed an agreement to settle disputes exclusively through binding arbitration - I believe this is an almost universal practice in the financial industry, as a condition for doing business, and no, you can't take your business elsewhere. That arbitration is widely regarded (at least outside of the industry) as being biased towards the financial industry.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...