But Qt has NO Web support. And you either have to use an old version, or go full GPL, or pay.

Microsoft is better at creating IDEs than just about anybody else for desktop applications. But when it comes to Web development. It was only the last version or two when they finally stopped creating mismatched HTML tags, and the Web page designer is still so unusable that you have to hand-code HTML / JavaScript for anything non-trivial. Maybe these problems have to do with Microsoft not owning the Web platform.

I hope they do a better job with Android. I really want them to do better, because I really hate Eclipse and Java!

Maybe Microsoft should sue Anderson for infringement of the term "windows" to refer to glass panels for your house!

The original trilogy was awesome, but later books were not the same caliber. But knowing how the entertainment industry works, they'll milk it for all its worth.

Kind of like Slashdot.

I used to not disable ads on Slashdot, you know, a site's got to make money somehow. But lately the ads have gotten SO annoying that I have to disable them, just to make the site usable!

Remember Crystal Reports? This was a tool that came out in 1991, that was supposed to make it possible for ANYONE to create their own business reports. No programming know-how needed. Remember?

For the past three years, I ran a team that created customized Crystal Reports for customers...because they couldn't figure out how to create them for themselves. It wasn't so much that the tool was hard to use, but more that the customers had only a foggy idea of what they wanted their reports to show.

For example, a doctor's office would call saying "I want a report that shows a list of patients who haven't had a mammogram in the last two years." Sounds easy enough. Then we would start asking questions: Do you want only active patients, or all? Do you want only those within a given date or age range? What patient information do you want in the report? Do you need totals or counts? Then, after we delivered the first draft, there would always be changes: "Yes, I like this, but can you change this filter or that column?" They needed to have experts guide them to a report that made sense for them.

Yes, software is getting better, but it will never replace the need for understanding.

They added two new features:
1. A "Forget" button for your privacy, and
2. Ads, that remember everything forever.

Sounds like a case of giving with one hand, and taking with the other!

(I don't need a button to help me forget things!)

I am both a programmer and a plumber, and I can tell you that plumbing isn't as bug-free as you make it out to be. For example, if you stuff too many potato peels down your garbage disposal too quickly, your sink will back up, requiring you to take apart the drain plumbing to get all the peels out. I know, I've had to do this in multiple houses. That's the equivalent of a page crashing when you put in bad data. If you put food down the disposal at a rate it can handle, it will work fine, and if you put reasonably good data into a given Web page, it usually works.

There is an entire industry devoted to fixing "bugs" in plumbing, from drain cleaners to root-removal services. How many bathroom sinks have drain stoppers that don't quite hold the water in the sink? How many shower drains get clogged? How many old pipes leak due to corrosion?

Yes, programming is a trade, like plumbing and electrical work. And like the other trades, programmers have to often fix issues due to problems that either weren't anticipated during construction. In my view, programmers in general don't create code that is particularly more shoddy than craftsmen of any other trade. With each trade, there is a trade-off between quality and cost.

Because H-1Bs are cheaper.

that schools don't teach coding. Schools might give people with coding talent a jump start, but as with art, you either get it or you don't.

"Learning the skills" just means that you can type in some lines of code, and make it do something. That's a far cry from learning what it takes to create quality software.

They are sometimes referred to as "teenagers."

Obviously, if no one is coming forward with money, it must be a conspiracy.

Did anybody notice...the linked article about the removal request...was a Washington Post article? And this article prominently displays a link to the original review. It doesn't seem the request for removal is having the desired effect.

Then why is it still the law? Politicians are, above all things, good at figuring out what their constituents want. I suspect that the reality is, most people are either neutral, or do like it. Those who don't like it, complain loudly twice a year; those who do like it, just stay quiet because they already have a system they like.