I love how the Russian "SLS" version had four boosters. Someone over there must play Kerbal Space Program.

You'll soon come to love sleeping with your hand shackled to the Apple Watch charger.

Thieves don't need to bother with a chainsaw, I'll give them the watch. My life is worth much much more than any possession I own.

Same reason there are dozens of patents that are literal copies of previous patented works, but with the added phrase, "...on a computer."

I like the one about clothing pile amounts uncertainty. As if the author has never heard of loops.

We've been working on image recognition technology for almost 60 years now. We still haven't got it right.

And yet subway trains still happen to fall off the tracks and cause injuries and deaths.

Usually someone who rear-ends a car (a tailgater) is at fault for such a collision, at least from the insurance company's perspective.

Well, they say the law is blind, too.

Unfortunately, Chief Justice Marshall disagreed with you. Traffic falls under commerce just as much as trade. Take it up with SCOTUS if you have an issue.

Since you don't have anything to support your claims, and SCOTUS ruled that traffic is regulate-able commerce over 200 years ago, there's nothing left to rebut here.

Unfortunately "it freaks me out" is the same reason that someone could argue that a driver's license is required for a self-driving car. And that is still poor justification for both arguments. Our laws should be driven by facts, not fear.

No, certainly not. The 10th amendment deals with that. But to protect something so vehemently, you usually need a bigger piece of collateral than the 10th amendment.

States have the right to regulate commerce within their state, and Congress the right to regulate interstate commerce. Driving a vehicle falls well within the regulatory bounds of commerce, and can easily be argued within the government's domain of regulation, and not a unilateral right of the citizen.

So, I'll ask again. Do you have anything that supports your claims?

Pretty sure I got in before the mod did. I'd happily do the modding if I had the points for it.

More than likely, the self-driving car would stop for the pedestrian in the crosswalk as well as the floating, plastic bag tossed around by the wind.

Got support for those grandiose statements to begin with? I wasn't able to find "driving a car" in my copy of the bill of rights.