Comment Re:When referring to Scientology.... (Score 1) 779
Wikipedia disagrees with you.
agnosticism is not just about "not making up your mind".
Please, do not confuse "non-existant" with "jet unkown". It may be right if you talk about knowledge, but you're wrong if we talk about phisical existance.
Example: atoms were not known thousands of years ago, but the world kept togheter anyway. Guess why?
So agnostics actually have "made up their mind", and they decided not to toss a coin to choose their religion.
You can't be "right" or "wrong" on what the coin will give. You're either luky or not. It's different.
Btw, it is provable that something does _not_exist, since phisics is also math... like, it's easy to prove that you can't have perpetual motion, and even get energy from it, right?
I am sorry if that breaks your world-view, but it breaks most people's.
agnosticism is not just about "not making up your mind".
Please, do not confuse "non-existant" with "jet unkown". It may be right if you talk about knowledge, but you're wrong if we talk about phisical existance.
Example: atoms were not known thousands of years ago, but the world kept togheter anyway. Guess why?
So agnostics actually have "made up their mind", and they decided not to toss a coin to choose their religion.
You can't be "right" or "wrong" on what the coin will give. You're either luky or not. It's different.
Btw, it is provable that something does _not_exist, since phisics is also math... like, it's easy to prove that you can't have perpetual motion, and even get energy from it, right?
I am sorry if that breaks your world-view, but it breaks most people's.