Because he is the one that arrogantly ignored the democratic process, stole a massive store of intelligence documents, incompetently encrypted them, and made them available for friend and foe alike, and then fled to be among Americas adversaries. Surely you must see some room for assigning culpability to him?
Our own government "ignored the democratic process". Even the author of the Patriot Act says the NSA is abusing the law by collecting (i.e. stealing) such a large amount of their citizens' private information.
The NSA didn't make the documents available to China and Russia. Snowden did.
You're overlooking the fact that the NSA and its allies are the ones who made Snowden available to Russia in the first place.
You mean the copies of the phone records of many, but not all, Americans? That was repeatedly authorized, including by courts.
Once again, I refer you to the author of the Patriot Act, who says: "No public court has ever upheld document collection that is remotely close to the dragnet at issue. . . . The administration therefore admits that its bulk collection is unprecedented."
CONGRESS. Snowden could have gone to CONGRESS. He didn't.
If he was that naive, he'd be spending the rest of his life in solitary confinement, and we'd still be in the dark.
No, it was fully preemptive right from the start. It was a major selling point.
It was the Mac that did cooperative.
Mind you, preemptive on a 68000 wasn't flawless. Saw a lot of GURU in the day.
-MB- is that you?
The 1541, on the other hand, would misalign if you looked at it funny.
Amen brother.
My 3 Amigas were NOT "PC"s. 2 of them were "PC compatible", thanks to Bridgeboards.
Son, I was there. Owned 3 Amigas.
Amigas were NOT PCs - and saying so in the wrong circles would get you shot.
"PC" meant it ran MS-DOS.
Chinese government corruption has moved away from the central government to the local governments. It's not fair or accurate to say that there hasn't been progress made.
And that has been Tesla's argument for the last ten years, yet they still lose about $9,000 on each car they make.
"On" each car, or "for" each car?
"On" makes it sound like their marginal costs are negative -- that, literally, producing one more car increases their losses by $9K. Were it "for" each car, then they're losing money only after fixed costs, R&D, etc. are taken into account.
That latter makes considerably more sense -- folks can legitimately decide to back a company investing in itself rather than taking out a profit; indeed, Amazon has done that for years.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?
