to put up Anonymus face masks when driving and put life-size puppets in back seats.

only over my dead... and that's already assigned to students teaching/research. Sorry Apple hype.

S/he who has the money and can't get enough of it and then after dying to pass his/her legacy on to their offspring to continue to live on there - all a great mind game,
Reality is different..
Mostly it seems to be "he's" doing this kind of game.

But somebody must have paid secretly. At one point in time this was called bribery and people doing this and got caught were put in jail. Nowadays it seems to be the law of the land... Oh no, the law of the chosen few - chosen by god or something like that.

You are making me laugh - the joke of the day!
Mark parent up as funny!!

Not to worry, TTIP will fix that.

"And I will tell you completely honestly: I'd rather die in the flight than live to be 80 years old and see this country fall."

I'd think so....

What he is pointing out is the money corruption going on and making this whole political game a charade - just look at those faces... clowns?

It would be worth laughing about it if it wouldn'd be so sad.

in all of this is that it is not actually a "Comcast" or other juristic entity but the people lining up behind a certain idea and then marching in lock-step.
So - are they all hypnotized or is it some hard-wired crowd behavior?

Nobody will get into a "power" position without conforming to some standard behavior present in a particular group.
I guess, a lot of it is fear-driven, by being afraid loosing a familiar surrounding or whatever one identifies as being advantageous.

The other thing is the spectators around simlpifying the issue, projecting their disgust and hatred on some neural association - Comcast/Time-Warner merger is "bad". On one side, but nobody would pursue something like that without seeing a benefit.
Who is the driving part behing this? The individuals pushing this forward, who are they - what kind of persons? Sickos to do something like that or swimming on top of the cream, wanting to stay there with their companion-floaters sucking everyone below them and getting high on it?

I think, identifying the individual pushers, publishing their names, bio and what else they do to make the crap transparent would help better.

Somewhere in their hypnosis, there must be a part living where it knows all this is not so great..

Talk about geo-engineering mind-fuck. The tools to do it are right in place, just open your eyes: Trees, grasses, shrubs, best suited for the job and well tested for eons.

What is actually happening?

Humanity and it's internal power structures are destroying them.

Maybe the human DNA needs a patch from those plants to get healty?

not emphasize enough:
Before roundup-ready plants who are immune against the plant killing effects of roundup were available, with spraying herbicides to reduce pressure from weeds, the cultured plants needed to be shielded from getting in touch with the herbicide.
Now,with roundup-ready plants, shielding is no longer necessary and the cultured plants get the full load of herbicide.

The aspect of GMO-modified plants with their "foreign" genes is the usually perceived bad thing about GMO.
The secondary effect of much higher exposure in plants to herbicide when consumed which I think is much more damaging to our health is undervalued in communications around GMO effects.

Thanks for the limited brain compliment. I like those, qualifying the author right off the bat.
As I mentioned before, it's a taboo issue.
I can be polemic as well: Old impotent males getting off on playing with babies dicks and reducing their sensitivity for life - perversion to the highest degree!

For the facts:

Penis foreskin removed, some consequences:

1. Glands penis is no longer protected and exposed to abrasion which causes a hardening of glands penis surface skin - also named orange peel - causing sensitivity reduction in the range of 40 - 60 %.
2. Foreskin has nerve endings and sensitivity - gone.
3. With foreskin removed, the outer skin of the penis can no longer move back and forth during intercourse causing increased friction and abrasion.

Here is a quote from http://www.cirp.org/library/an... :

> During heterosexual activity, the mucosal surfaces of the glans penis and
> foreskin move back and forth across the mucosal surfaces of the labia and
> vagina, providing nontraumatic sexual stimulation of both male and female.
> This mucous-membrane-to-mucous-membrane contact provides the natural
> lubrication necessary for sexual relations and prevents both the dryness
> responsible for painful intercourse and the chafing and abrasions
> which allow entry of sexually transmitted diseases, both viral and bacterial.

Circumcision may have had value in societies in dry climates with very limited water supplies, who knows where this originated. Nowadays it seems to be promoted by religious fanatics and sexual perverts harming males for life!

Fact is that a healthy vagina has an acidic environment due to lactic acid bacteria and prevents disease causing organisms.

So - a penis visiting a healthy vagina frequently may be the best prevention of STD and other (mind)crap.

I mean the underlying cause for this operation, a common procedure done on man without consent in a very young age because?
The last thing I heard about this was a campaign on boys age over 10 getting talked into getting circumcised was to prevent AIDS...
The only mammal on this planet tinkering with their dicks in that manner are humans - supposedly having the largest brain.
Must be progress then....

Well, how do you install Firefox on an Android 4.4.2 device (Samsung Tab S) without Google Play and NOT giving access to:
- device and app history
- identity
- location
- pictures, media, files
- camera
- microphone
- WLAN connection info
- besides: read sync statistics and download files without notification
(that's right from the permission list displayed before install)
How would anyone not totally stoned allow such access rights?

That's idiotic, gimme a break!

that those concerned about others ending their life are projecting their own fear of dying.
Who owns one's life? The one living it or some politician, priest or shrink mindfucking about it and continuing trying to dominate others?

that those concerned about other's ending their life are projecting their own fear of dying. Who owns one's life? Some priest, politician or shrink or the one living it?