Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:FOSS is still safer... (Score 1) 582

We don't but that goes with any product out there. The difference is software has things like License Agreements and Terms of Service most of which give the software vendor no liability whatsoever for their product if it fails to perform. Imagine if you bought a car with a License Agreement that said "you have a license to use this vehicle however we assume no liability for it's use or damages caused by or within the vehicle." In the case of software vendors when problems are found they shrug their shoulders and introduce a patch or fix. If the software is no longer supported, they'll just direct you to their professional services folks and sign you up for custom support or the sales department to get you to buy their latest offerings.

Another aspect of vulnerabilities like this isn't from a security but also a safety perspective. Bad software has killed people. Read "Fatal Defect." It's an older book but it's a fascinating study of bad software design that's actually killed people.

Comment Re:Overstating the case (Score 1) 582

There are companies that sell vulnerabilities to anybody with deep enough pockets. They're looking at software constantly to find exploits and I wouldn't be surprised if open source wasn't on the menu for them as well. I think open source does lead to quicker fixes once they're discovered by white hats out there unlike closed source models where a company has a vested interest in not disclosing exposures while either muddling through a fix. Case in point, the fact that Oracle knew about the zero day vulnerabilities in Java for months before addressing them. The problem is that businesses and developers seem to shrug that off rather than saying it's not acceptable and other companies just follow the same pattern. In the case of Oracle it didn't hurt them much at all and validates their lousy business practice on addressing vulnerabilities. Just looking now, in early summer 2012 when the news hit, their stock sank to $25.61/share and it just hit $42 on 4/2. So in under two years that's an almost 64% increase in their stock price.

Comment Re:Nuclear is obvious, an energy surplus is desire (Score 1) 433

Well you had to live during the whole TMI episode to understand the panic it created. Sadly it was a turning point for nuclear power in this country. After that Jimmy Carter pulled the permits for all proposed nuclear plants and stopped the TVA for example in their tracks on 4 plants that were in progress. He and his buds in congress the bureaucratic nightmare that is now the DOE. That kind of knee-jerk reaction pushed investors away and you have to look around and see that. Until 2013 there has been no ground-breaking on new plants since 1977, the same year as TMI. So if you want to see how one administration can doom an industry in this country, look at TMI and the ripple effects. TMI was minor but the public became afraid and movies like the "The China Syndrome" didn't help either. These plants were built on investments mostly through bonds or by the Federal Government in the case of the TVA and investors want safe returns on their money and because of TMI, nuclear became a pariah in the US. Look at the whole Yucca Mountain situation if you need a refresher course on how jammed up things can become.

I won't argue that nuclear power is cheaper overall, in most cases it isn't. It is efficient given the size/complexity of the plant and the output it produces. It's cleaner than coal or burning gas on many levels. It is a political football and if you look at the closing of San Onofre you can see that everybody including DC based ass-clowns want to get into the act. I used to surf at San Onofre beach right next to the plant and it was always great because the water was warmer from the cooling water released back into the ocean near offshore. It was fine then, it'd be fine now but politics is politics as they say.

That's why authoritarian/autocratic societies will be able to expand the use of nuclear power faster than democracies and while we may push for solar nuclear is in the same boat as to why we don't consider large hydro projects either in this country because a) we've pretty much exhausted most of aquifer systems necessary for large scale hydro b) environmental impact studies take decades and we might hurt the fish (see snail darter for a reference) c) tree-hugging morons who are the same idiots against nuclear power. These folks still tool around in pre-1980s VW vans for example and vacation at Burning Man. Sure we can do more wind power but now we kill bald eagles, hawks and other birds so that's bad oh wait, what about more solar? Yeah, with nearly 100% imported technology we give away our engineering skills, money and competitive advantage to nations ultimately selling us out now and for future generations.

One thing I can agree with with the IPCC is that human activity is fucking up the planet but we live here and in order to live in the confines of our modern society that requires energy. Ultimately energy choices will dictate, as they always have, what nations/regions of the planet will be successful and thrive while others will either wither into pre-industrial decay or keep being places where they mine conflict diamonds and other resources for those successful nations who take an aggressive approach to energy production.

Comment Re:Seriously? You Guys Shitstorm Over This? (Score 1) 448

People should be more worried that former Sen. Chris Dodd is in charge over at the MPAA. It's funny how an ex-politician who swore he'd never lobby is now in charge of one of the most powerful lobbying groups. This position has led to him pushing SOPA/PIPA which failed awhile back but he's still there pushing for more and more things to fuck with your lives online.

And folks are worried about Condolezza Rice @ Dropbox ?

Comment Re:Nuclear is obvious, an energy surplus is desire (Score 1) 433

Oh I don't have a problem with Nuclear energy but most nations don't have the political will to push forward with it. With the cost of each plant possibly in the Billions you also have to wonder if the investment community will back it as well because the money has to come somewhere. I'm also in favor of pushing for more local Solar along the lines of household domestic use considering we're burning through a lot of natural gas just dealing with peak load demands. Then again, I'm not in DC so all I can do is invest in areas where I think it'll help... You know, think globally, act locally but that still means dealing with retarded Gladys Kravitz types who will fight you putting up solar panels on your roof or planting a few more trees in your yard.

Slashdot Top Deals

"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." - Voltaire

Working...