I think your understanding kinda sucks. The US didn't "build" the internet. US-based researchers developed the initial concepts and protocols that are the foundation of the internet. "The US" didn't build the communication infrastructure in Europe, Canada or the Middle East. "The US" didn't raise ISPs around the world and didn't connect households in Norway to communication hubs.

"The US" can't tell an ISP in Germany or Brazil what IP address to map a given domain name to. If those ISPs decided to map it to something else, there is fuck all "The US" can do about it.

I don't understand one thing - all of this is based on David Sanger's book, which in turn is based on "unnamed US, European and Israeli sources".

Other than the author's reputation, do we have anything resembling evidence that this isn't just a science fiction book being sold?

Nobody. As in "I think Nobody should have complete control over the internet".

The internet is a global "region". I don't use the word "resource" here because I don't consider it a resource in this context. I think it's more comparable to international waters. There are globally accepted rules about international waters and the global community enforces them. Any country with a coast also has a portion of the sea which is considered "theirs" and within it their rules apply. But the rest of it belongs to no one.

I think the same thing should happen to the internet. And let's be frank, by "the internet" here we mean control of TLDs, as everything else derives from that. The US government can then block "fuckamerica.com" from within the US, but not completely take it down in the rest of the world. That's the way it should be.

Funny, as an Israeli I often feel that same way about the US.

However if you pulled your head our of your arse for a second and remembered that in politics you have to read in between the lines, you might just realize out that Israel isn't really a factor in the US' desire to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Israel will, on the other hand, probably have to be the executor of everybody's wishes - the US, Europe *and the Arab world* are all terrified of the prospect of a nuclear weapon in the hands of Iran and the extremists governing it. Iran's ballistic missiles can already reach western Europe and if you think it's just Europe's and the middle east's problem then ask yourself how long will it be before a nuclear bomb developed by the Ayatollah's regime will end up in the hands of extremist terrorist groups and set off in NY or DC? Try to imagine the horror scenario of 9/11 with nuclear bombs instead of crashing airliners. So everybody will condemn us and silently be relieved, and we will eat the Iranian retaliation which will likely be painful and cost Israeli lives. But who gives a fuck when a few Israelis die anyway. The important thing is that European and American lives are spared.

What you are seeing right now is one last desperate attempt by the US and Europe to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon through diplomatic and economic means. I wish I had any hope it will succeed because when it fails the shit can really hit the fan. All this BS about Israel being threatened is just part of the politics and propaganda aimed at people who can't see the real reasons behind these events. The US and Europe actually serve their own interests (as they should) and Israel is just a front.

Well it's well known that the Death Star is full of brits...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKfeJ2mw0LU

Because British actors can only play the bad guys in American movies.

It's still a step up from nuclear meltdown isn't it?

You have to see things in perspective...

Can you give an example of a managed, cross-platform, enterprise language for which the above statement is incorrect?

Personally I believe that what we are witnessing is a global economic version of "Communicating Vessesls".

With the sudden availability of shipping of goods on a global scale and outsourcing, the natural thing happens: wealth starts pouring from the fuller rich vessel (the US) to the less full one (poorer countries). Shouting at how this is all the fault of some evil caste of managers is pointless. Humans do what humans do, and markets do what markets do.

One day the system will reach an equilibrium. China and India can't stay poor forever when so much wealth is going their way. Eventually a more educated and wealthy middle class will emerge, the country will develop and eventually transform from that empty vessel to a full one.

When that happens the opposite of what we are witnessing today will happen - when labour costs in China and India will match or almost match those in the US, US companies will not longer have an incentive to outsource and industries will re-emerge in the US. However something else will also happen then - there will be a billion new wealthy people on the other side of the world to sell products to.

What's next? Charging a husband who read his wifes diary. Oh yes there was a lock on it and he broke it. No that wouldn't reach court, but hackers - those smelly dodgy think they are smarter than us geek types - let's lock all of them up and throw away the key! They are terrorists! And they want to give away the fruit of all of hard work for free!

What the hell are they putting in your water?

Of course she can change her mind, but saying that the guy who didn't stop when his GF asked him to stop in the middle of sex is exactly the same type of asshole who stalks your GF in a dark alley, hits her over the head, drags her to a corner, strips her and sticks his willy inside her body while she is crying and begging - if we are using the exact same word to describe both guys and we think they both deserve the same punishment, then I'm sorry - but something here is very wrong here!

We could also classify the guy who didn't stop as being rude and insensitive and she shouldn't have sex with him again. There are a lot of rude people out there and they don't go to jail for it.

RE the "media kerfluffle", I'd appreciate if you could support this with something. I'd like to see evidence of this before he started annoying people, not just before this leak. He's been a pain in some governments butts for a long time now.

Got modded Troll for saying this which I'm not sure why.

Anyway I think the chances of these accusations against Assange being completely unrelated to the leak and the timing being coincidental are pretty slim. It's kinda obvious that higher powers have targetted him. It's even more scary because it seems that these days the easiest way to hurt someone is by accusations of sexual assault. Who would dare hint that it might be untrue? I mean even on Slashdot one gets modded down -1 as Troll for raising this option...

Here's a quote from the article:

I don't understand - the condom broke in the middle so she asked him to stop, he didn't - and that's rape?

I don't see what good all of this would make - so you cleanse sites hosted on US servers from bomb-making info. Stil leaves plenty of them around the rest of the world...

You forgot the exclamation mark.

Israel has both. Check you facts.