You haters ought to get together and discuss what FUD you're going to spread. I pays to be consistent.
Stop playing semantic games and just admit that there are no real alternative browsers, only wrappers around Apple's version of webkit, or some Frankensteinian monstrosity that offloads processing to the server.. Anyway, I joined this conversation to make a point and now must leave it point made, whether or not the recipient of my words understood them.
The Republican party has a gay coalition (the "Log Cabin Republicans PAC", GOProud Inc., etc.).
OMG, stop talking. Right now. Those quislings, forgiving towards homophobes, willing to sacrifice marriage equality and discrimination protections for their pieces of silver. You'll find that members of GOProud skew white, rich and most often originating from the South. If that's your view of how "gays are split on parties" then that's a very distorted view. There are much more LGBT people (in fact, I doubt there are many T of LGBT people in the log cabin) who are against GOProud than there are GOProuders.
It's a pretty big one, don't you think, ending slavery? I also mentioned Eisenhower pushing for Civil Rights legislation over LBJ's objections to it in the Senate, but you forgot that real fast, didn't you? And that's the real problem with most of the electorate: they too quickly forget history.
Something tells me Abraham Lincoln and Eisenhower would be Democrats today if they were transported through time to this era. Your skewed view of events makes sense once you mentioned the log cabin. Have a nice time in there (assuming you're LGBT).
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra