Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Aha! He's probably not *really* psychic! (Score 1) 552

Are you claiming to be some sort of psychic?

Many people could learn much, from your rigorous skepticism! If I may indiscreetly boast a little in fraternal camaraderie, I share your gift, though to a lesser degree. By seeing through some people's bullshit, we have learned to discern much knowledge about the world.

The year is 2014, and guy walks up and shouts, "I'm Napoleon Bonaparte! Soon, Europe shall be mine!" Further confounding us, this is immediately followed by a second guy on his heels, who claims, "I'm Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington. Your army will soon be defeated, Napoleon!" Right off (so much quicker than I, I must admit [I bow to you]), you are squinting suspiciously at the second guy, a sneer of distrust on your face. It takes me a while to trace your logical steps, but eventually I arrive at the same elementary conclusion that you did: that he is Wellington, is totally preposterous! Why? Because Wellington has been dead over 150 years!

It's so simple, a child should be able to see it. Yet, few people realize what we do.

So while the rest of Slashdot reels in confusion, not knowing what is going on and what is going to happen next, we have already figured it all out. We divest or short-sell various European enterprises, invest heavily in French war bonds, and await the riches that shall soon be ours. Everyone else thinks we're mad fools, but soon, they will gape in amazement at our prescience.

Using the power of reason alone (so simple, yet so rare), we have determined that that no one stands in Napolean's path, to prevent him from conquering all of Europe.

Comment Re:I'll get flak for this (Score 1) 552

An atheist can be as big of an asshole, but if atheists are wrong then at least they're not as big of a security risk. Since they don't pray, they don't ever accidentally get the attention of Gozer or Yog-Sothoth or Jehova or Ra with their mystic brain waves. "Somebody wants help, do they? Where? Earth? Earth?! So, life has returned to Earth, and it .. it [buzz buzz, tuning prayers] .. it can feel pain and fear? *drool* Doris, I'm going out to lunch. Hold my prayers."

Comment DO NOT DO THAT, until you can prove it's safe (Score 3, Funny) 552

No!! Wait. How do you know that praying didn't cause the problem to happen in the first place, and that prayers aren't prolonging the paralysis? How do you know the consequences of a prayer?

People, please!! If you are going to going to bring awesome cosmic powers to bear on this problem, you need to do it responsibly. You are meddling with supernatural forces that can shape galaxies, part seas, resurrect dead people, inflict or cure cancer, turn people into columns of salt, and win football games. We have already had it explained many times to us, that these things "work in mysterious ways" and that their plans are not always apparent to us, and their minds are beyond our capacity to understand. We can never assume that they want what we want.

If you are going to call on beings of infinite power, don't you think you ought to first understand the causes and effects? Wouldn't that be prudent, in a basic "not totally reckless and negligent on a potentially PLANETARY scale" sense?

Perhaps this patient was paralyzed as retribution for some conceit of hubris on her part, as one of life's lessons. By allying with her (i.e. interfering with her enlightenment), you might be paralyzed next, whether as punishment for defying the will of the gods, or maybe even as little lesson in hubris of your own.

Ok, maybe she was paralyzed by The Great Enemy, because she was close to uttering the Word of Justice that would undo all the Enemy's plans, so by calling on the Enemy's enemy, you might be able to help her, get the Word uttered, and all evil will finally be banished from the world forever and ever. Yet it is just as likely, that she was about to utter the Word of Despair, plunging America into yet another Eight Years of Apathy, and it was only by some hero's hours-long (and expensive, due to the rarity of some of the herbs and oils used) ritual that managed to stop her, and by bringing Great Powers into this, you might bring about the Eight Years of Apathy.

It could be happening because of something as mundane as the tumor "cover story", but then whichever god answers your prayer and cures her first (you know that prayer works, but do you know how it works, how it propagates, etc?), will be owed a favor by her, which might be a horrific lifelong struggle for her; whereas without your arrogant meddling, she might have recovered naturally anyway, without any long-term spiritual debts. Or -- are you sure you truly understand all the mechanics here, and that not only have you totally mastered Law of Man, but you also have perfect insight into the Law of the Gods -- perhaps the debt will be YOURS.

If a doctor were to idly carve on her brainstem without knowing what he was doing, you would be among those crying "malpractice!" But here you are, barging in with your hasty invocations of the mightiest powers that history has ever known, using a bulldozer-the-size-of-a-mountain to swat flies on the rim of a teacup. You would purify a pint of water with a lake of iodine, poisoning the drinker. You would shoot a man for snorin' too loud, light a cigarette with a hydrogen bomb, and write a "hello world" program that compiled to a 6 terabyte binary.

I beg -- no, insist -- all those considering resorting to the extremity of prayer, to first carefully consider all the ramifications. Make sure you understand how it really works, Whom you are really contacting, what you're really asking of Them, what it truly costs, etc. You may be doing more harm than good, and you might be involving innocent third parties.

Indeed, even if it were just one person's life at stake (and it's not!), I don't think it would be too out of line for me to demand that you first prove (to reasonable degree of certainty; we don't have to get all mathematical here) that the effects will be benign. At least do some controlled studies.

Is that not reasonable? I submit to you, that you would ask the same thing of a much less powerful, and much less dangerous doctor. No neurosurgeon's erroneous scalpel, can possible destroy a galaxy, summon The End of Time, create zombies (well, ok, maybe neurosurgeons can do that, but not a whole plague of them), time-travel everyone on Earth six thousand years back in time to The One Day of Cretacious, turn every firstborn daughter instantly into a lesbian, or alter history such that the second amendment never got ratified. God can do that, and just might, unless you're saying you're Him and you know what He's thinking. Is that what you're saying, punk?

Comment ads in car (Score 1) 355

As far as the automotive portion of this, they've overlooked a pretty critical detail...

Are you sure they have overlooked this? I think the words "google" and "car" and "driver" have been used in a lot of sentences over the last few years, especially with the word "driver" modified.

Make no mistake, there really is a vision here, and it's pretty damn clever (even if it's also insideous and horrible). Outside of dense areas with usable public transportation, a lot of "eye hours" are being "wasted" every day. Google is able to fund work on self-driving-car development, precisely because claiming this resource will be so much like finding the holy grail.

Human: "Take me to Joe's Brewpub."

Car: "Ok, here we go. By the way, Fred's Brewpub is also nearby and they have a new Imperial Red Ale that has received 14 positive reviews in the last 4 days. Would you like to g--"

Human: "Take me to Fred's."

Google: "Dear Fred, one conversion. That'll be a dollar, please."

Joe: "Dear Google, I would like to place an ad."

Comment Re:open source? (Score 1) 107

If all the I/O is subverted, then you better make sure you really sent your key, though.

Crazy sci-fi dystopian future scenario is that Alice's software decides to send her key as qrcodes but then actually displays Eve's key's qrcodes but also sends Alice's public key over covert channel. Then the Bob's software, wishing to display a fingerprint for its new key (Eve's) on screen, does that. Except its subverted I/O shows Alice's fingerprint instead. Bob reads the fingerprint out loud and Alice says "Yep, that's mine" (because it is) in spite of the fact that Alice really has the wrong key. Later, Eve MitMs everything Bob and Alice say to each other.

Sounds like a lot of work and requires her subverted subsystems to be quite powerful. (It has to understand the intent of everything that goes up on a screen in real time, and do replacements.) That's ridiculous and there's no way it'll happen before 2114. *sigh* That probably means someone is already doing it successfully. ;-)

Comment Episode V, Fuck Yeah! (Score 1) 457

Empire was a beautiful movie. I'm not even a Star Wars "nut" and I would say that outside of the scope of "which of [faintly derogatory dismissive tone] these is best?" that movie deserves high marks relative to the average movie. The Empire Strikes Back is positively delicious. The people who put those totally irrelevant flashing lights on the safety guard rails at Bespin really deserve to be proud and I'm sorry it took a third of a century for you to hear it from me. But I did notice them and I do care. Thank you. I hope not too many of you are dead yet.

Comment Two Hops (Score 1) 107

I hereby request all CostCo, Amazon, and my local power and water utility company customers to please abstain from ever being suspected of anything.

If you're not sure whether or not you might be suspected of a crime, perhaps a good rule of thumb is that you should try to stay two hops away from any actual criminals. So if you're a Bank of America customer, yes, that means I'm asking you to not use my local power utility.

Thank you for your cooperation.

NO, WAIT! NO!!! No, I didn't mean to imply I'm cooperating with those suspected suspects. No. Oh, shit. Shit! *sigh* Sorry, neighbors. Yes, of course, I will immediately cancel my local power utility.

Comment What rudeness? (Score 1) 248

instead, I gleaned that she ended up acting pretty damn rude to her relatives who inadvertently broke her self-imposed techology exile

I RTFAed but I didn't find any examples of rudeness.

All I can think of, is that maybe some people consider Facebook unfriending to be rude. Has that become true? Or was it some other act (e.g. asking people to help collect gift cards, maybe)?

Comment Re:What's the problem? (Score 1) 1198

Morally speaking, how different is a person that kills someone robbing them and a doctor killing someone to get a paycheck? They both killed for money, so there is not a whole lot of moral difference between the two acts.

Plenty of murders happen simply because "damn Vikings, moving into the neighborhood and lowering property values" or because "if I can't have you, no one can" or because someone was snorin' too loud or because that little voice in my head that usually just whispers "...be an asshole .. one-up all their anecdotes .. make backhanded comments about things they care about ..." whenever I meet someone, starts whispering "... kill them .. make it look like an accident, maybe involving the microwave oven and nondairy creamer .. no one will suspect..." instead. These people are still going to be considered murderers, even if unprofessional, and plenty of 'em, pro-DPers will still want executed.

Similarly, suppose the state sentences someone to die and calls for unpaid volunteer executioners. You know someone will come forth, willing to do the job. The state might even be able to charge them (it's easy to imagine a lottery, for certain high-profile cases.). Yet I doubt many anti-DPers will be any more accepting of the death sentence.

I don't think taking money out of it, is going to sway many people in either direction. If it does the job for you (and no, I don't seriously think that was your point) then you'd be in the minority. The debate would continue on, still never won by anyone. It ain't about the money.

Comment Re:Yahoo, kill yourself! (Score 5, Insightful) 300

So you are arguing that privacy/security on by default is a bad thing?

Nobody's arguing that. The mistake is in thinking of DNT with a privacy/security mechanism. If that's what it were, Microsoft's decision would be defensible or even good. But DNT is something totally different. I'd argue two things:

1) DNT is for expressing a user's preference. Not even just a preference, but the user's preference. It is impossible for any application's default setting to express a user's preference for anything. (Your editor can default to a white background, but it can't, out of the box, honestly tell other people that YOU prefer swiss cheese over provolone. The person who wrote your editor might have some strong opinions and could even show some polling information, but in the end, he doesn't really know what kind of cheese you want. He can only take a guess.) MSIE's default DNT:swiss header is a communication between a web server and Microsoft Corporation, rather than a communication between a web server and a user.

Yes, a DNT:swiss default is a bad thing (just as bad as a DNT:provolone default). By doing that, Microsoft undermined DNT and helped the ad industry justify ignoring it. If you're a user, you should be angry at MS about this (at least so far as DNT is important at all).

2) DNT is nearly useless for protecting a user's security. If you want security, then you must deny capability to your adversary, or put costs on things, not merely politely ask him to behave in a certain manner. That means having your browser not initiate certain connections, or not send certain things (or send noise) over those connections, or .. whatever.

I have to say "nearly" useless because at least DNT could signal that some users care, but just don't care enough to stop sending intell. But it looks like this subtlety was lost on .. damn .. nearly everyone, I think.

Up to now I've thought of DNT as a basically good idea (a weak one, but still positive), but maybe it's time to accept that if nobody understands DNT then it can't possibly communicate anything meaningful.

Comment Solve the general case (Score 3, Insightful) 1198

Why does the US still even have the Death penalty?

Why does the US still even have fines? Why does the US still even have imprisonment?

Answer any of these questions, and you'll have answered them all. Show the foolishness of any of them, and you'll have shown the foolishness of them all.

I think the most popular answer, is that we have these things to punish criminals. HTH.

Slashdot Top Deals

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...