Thank goodness, because Dawkins DID assert that sexual assault on a child is sometimes less damaging than teaching a child to follow Christianity.
The comparison is apt.
I had forgotten about F1, instead referring people to go online to find answers to their computer questions. But I wonder if I haven't been doing the wrong thing directing people to community support when they're ill-equipped to distinguish good advice from bad.
You pretty much defeat defeat your own argument without realizing it.
GP is comparing two broad classes of knowing how things works, and asserting that ignorance of one of them is a problem. This is not contradiction, it is drawing a distinction.
I don't need to know how my fuel injection system works, but I had better know what to do at a stop sign.
Huh. You don't get out much.
Excellent management of your forum persona.
I find that people who feel the need to perform stunts like this to make a point usually have trouble making a point in any other way, and a need for attention for themselves and their "cause." Yes, we get it, you hate the Bible. But you have no actual arguments against it beyond your dislike, and you're boring.
I find that people who feel the need to write a post like this to make a point usually have trouble making a point in any other way, and a need for attention for themselves and their "thesis." Yes, we get it, you are superior to everyone. But you have no actual arguments for it beyond your pretentious attitude, and you're annoying.
Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?
I sort of see a face in the last one. Admittedly, it is the face of Rorschach, but it's still a start!
"There is a way, my good brave intellectual... But it will be a challenging quest...", while the disoriented geek looks up, licking his thinkgeek caffeine soapbar, bubbling a partial disoriented yet interested: "Wut?"
You mean that caffeinated bar was SOAP?
And they are storing that cookie everywhere on the internet now a days. Google can build a pretty accurate profile about you (unless you've blocked it, but 'casual' people usually don't)
Google Analytics uses cookies called __utma, __utmb, __utmc, and __utmz (they have different expiry characteristics so GA can distinguish a "visit" from a "visitor"). Hands-on experiment: If you're not one of the people who blocks GA, open up your cookie jar right now and look for "utma". I expected to find a lot in mine, and I'm still surprised by how many are in there.
Have you actually used the Analytics service? It shows very detailed information about visitors, where they are coming from and what they do on the website.
It's pretty darn slick. GA got to be popular on its merits. But now that it's everywhere I worry about the aggregative power available to Google (not the individual GA users). Now that NoScript is gaining ground I occasionally worry that I ought to be doing my tracking locally because I won't know how many people have opted out of GA by declining its cookies.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion